Pretty much any router will handle that.

If you want do open source, you can do something like opnwrt on hardware they support. Or, build the whole thing yourself with opnsense on any device that can run FreeBSD.

Nope. It should be reviewed by a human, and the response should be proportionate.

Why maddening? The active shooter response shouldn’t be all that different/

You should also share the solution for future readers.

Google that string. Looks like it’s the key for the wine repo, not related to what you’re doing. Remove the offending repo, or add the key.

Probably not. In the data center, a server has its own temperature sensors. But most people never use those either and just use AC for the whole room.

Any chance it supports smart card cert auth? The only one I know of is putty, and I fucking hate putty.

Any drive should read faster than media playback. I’d check the actual read speed and playback logs to make sure you’re not having other issues.

32gb loop of Never Gonna Give You Up

SEO garbage has been around for much more than a decade. In fact, before Google got really good at search ranking, sites easily gamed the search engines.

I click the links to the source on the relevant part.

*facetious

I encrypt the whole disk.

If there’s nothing precious, wipe it.

Mounting a drive is the function of the OS. If you mean automatically disabling a port, no, typically motherboards don’t have that functionality.

Nothing. The field isn’t strong enough to affect the drive. They have much stronger magnets inside them all the time.

You could just use any other object too.

They gave James big tiddies in one episode, so why not?

If you’re using stuff like torrent clients, you can bind just those containers to gluetun. I recommend doing that instead of all of them. And then yeah the VPN server on the host.

It should work, but you may need to fiddle with routing.

Maybe. For photographs, it’s definitely not unconstitutional to make it illegal, because people have a right to privacy (4th amendment sort of, and 10th because they’re state laws).

For Trump, and for non-photographic media, it’s a little different. For one, he’s a very public figure. Another, you could argue it’s artistic, satirical, or critical of him.

Now if you were doing it maliciously, with intent to harass him personally, then yeah that would probably be considered not protected and carry civil or criminal liability.

Yes, but that wording is misleading. Typical web discovery happens when a crawler finds a published link. It sounds like in this case, they’re just giving each and every share link to Google etc, even if the link is not posted anywhere public.