Your response is short and quippy in a way that might be read as un-serious or dismissive, but its absolutely correct.
The users come first. The software is a tool and has no inherent “needs”.
Your average user likely agrees with the statement " my device sending my data to big tech, and being cluttered with ads isn’t nice", but they lack the time, knowledge, and interest to fix it.
Once installed, Linux (on supported hardware) is (to my best understanding and experience) no harder or easier than windows or Mac for most things.
I understand my tech expertise might give be blinders on the accuracy of that statement, but I have witnessed enough similar sentiment to begin believing it.
The challenge is getting over the installation hurdle, and putting users in the same mindset Mac users already instinctively have: “the instructions you find online might not apply to you because you are not in the majority”.
Preinstalled by OEM is it. The final and ultimate hurdle to gain a loooot of traction.
You’re absolutely right that individual users would benefit from Linux, the privacy, lack of ads, open source software, etc. And yes, the technical barriers are mostly solvable.
But here’s the thing, the Linux we’d need to build to get mass OEM adoption probably wouldn’t be the Linux that provides those benefits anymore.
Linux doesn’t need more users.
well we’ll get downvoted into oblivion but i agree.
But more users need Linux.
Your response is short and quippy in a way that might be read as un-serious or dismissive, but its absolutely correct.
The users come first. The software is a tool and has no inherent “needs”.
Your average user likely agrees with the statement " my device sending my data to big tech, and being cluttered with ads isn’t nice", but they lack the time, knowledge, and interest to fix it.
Once installed, Linux (on supported hardware) is (to my best understanding and experience) no harder or easier than windows or Mac for most things.
I understand my tech expertise might give be blinders on the accuracy of that statement, but I have witnessed enough similar sentiment to begin believing it.
The challenge is getting over the installation hurdle, and putting users in the same mindset Mac users already instinctively have: “the instructions you find online might not apply to you because you are not in the majority”.
Preinstalled by OEM is it. The final and ultimate hurdle to gain a loooot of traction.
You’re absolutely right that individual users would benefit from Linux, the privacy, lack of ads, open source software, etc. And yes, the technical barriers are mostly solvable. But here’s the thing, the Linux we’d need to build to get mass OEM adoption probably wouldn’t be the Linux that provides those benefits anymore.
More users means more people growing up using it and wanting to be developers. More users means more companys making software that runs on Linux