• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    threatens to “financially ruin” the entire AI industry

    No. Just the LLM industry and AI slop image and video generation industries. All of the legitimate uses of AI (drug discovery, finding solar panel improvements, self driving vehicles, etc) are all completely immune from this lawsuit, because they’re not dependent on stealing other people’s work.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But it would also mean that the Internet Archive is illegal, even tho they don’t profit, but if scraping the internet is a copyright violation, then they are as guilty as Anthropic.

      • magikmw@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        IA doesn’t make any money off the content. Not that LLM companies do, but that’s what they’d want.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          And this is exactly the reason why I think the IA will be forced to close down while AI companies that trained their models on it will not only stay but be praised for preserving information in an ironic twist. Because one side does participate in capitalism and the other doesn’t. They will claim AI is transformative enough even when it isn’t because the overly rich invested too much money into the grift.

        • axmo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Profit (or even revenue) is not required for it to be considered an infringement, in the current legal framework.