• BussyCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not because they would only train on things they own which is an absolute tiny fraction of everything that everyone owns. It’s like complaining that a rich person gets to enjoy their lavish estate when the alternative is they get to use everybody’s home in the world.

      • BussyCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have 0.2T in assets the world has around 660T in assets which as I said before is a tiny fraction. Obviously both hold a lot of assets that aren’t worthwhile to AI training such as theme parks but when you consider a single movie that might be worth millions or billions has the same benefit for AI training as another movie worth thousands. the amount of assets Disney owned is not nearly as relevant as you are making it out to be

        • ShadowWalker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Until they charge people to use their AI.

          It’ll be just like today except that it will be illegal for any new companies to try and challenge the biggest players.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            why would I use their AI? on top of that, wouldn’t it be in their best interests to allow people to use their AI with as few restrictions as possible in order to maximize market saturation?