themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1463arrow-down122
arrow-up1441arrow-down1external-linkThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-squareMysteriousSophon21@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 days agoTechnical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoSo it’s the CEO they should replace.
minus-squareEnd-Stage-Ligma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 days ago it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistency. Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
minus-squaremedem@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days ago…which is why I categorically refuse to use the term Artificial intelligence .
Technical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
So it’s the CEO they should replace.
Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
…which is why I categorically refuse to use the term Artificial intelligence .