• floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You’re missing the point: macOS is free. Just because you have to buy hardware to run it on doesn’t make it any different than any other free operating system like Linux. There’s plenty of hardware that doesn’t support Linux , too, so your argument, especially falls apart there.

    • androidisking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There’s a massive difference: Linux doesn’t require you to buy specific hardware from a specific vendor to legally run it. macOS does. With Linux, if your hardware isn’t supported, it’s a technical limitation. With macOS, it’s an intentional restriction enforced by Apple through both legal terms (EULA) and hardware locks.

      That’s the difference between open and closed systems. Linux lets you try on anything—even if it might not fit perfectly. Apple forces you to buy their clothes before you’re allowed in the store.

      Difference my guy.

      • floo@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Sure it does. You have to have a compatible processor, compatible, memory, etc. to run Linux. Just because one has some stricter hardware requirements than another doesn’t mean it’s not just as free as the other operating system.

        Regardless, none of this has anything to do with the fact that macOS is free.