cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/45277582

Opening my weather app this morning I was greeted by this warning:

Google has announced that, starting in 2026/2027, all apps on certified Android devices will require the developer to submit personal identity details directly to Google. Since the developers of this app do not agree to this requirement, this app will no longer work on certified Android devices after that time.

It’s the first time I hear about this, seems to be about:

Tech crunch article from august, “google will require developer verification for android apps outside the play store”

Cirrus app: Github

Was this a big thing I somehow missed? I hope more devs will follow suit.

  • jcarax@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Unfortunately, I think the vast majority who care are already using one. However, with Google device tree and other shenanigans on Pixel devices, it probably makes substantial room within the niche market for the likes of Fairphone and Shiftphone to get into new regions.

    On the other hand, mandates for major operating systems to report illegal activity that are in the pipeline could have a larger effect.

    I dunno, I’m talking out my ass.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      On the other hand, mandates for major operating systems to report illegal activity that are in the pipeline could have a larger effect.

      That’s pretty much what I’m afraid of, full 1984

      • jcarax@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And massive propaganda campaigns are turning people’s civic energy back on themselves, and their own communities. Ain’t life grand?

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If I didnt have to pay 2x - 3x the price for a fairphone in the US I would’ve already switched. Unfortunately, $1k for a device with USB 2.0 is really not worth it for me or anyone else I know.

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        If I didnt have to pay 2x - 3x the price for a fairphone in the US I would’ve already switched. Unfortunately, $1k for a device with USB 2.0 is really not worth it for me or anyone else I know.

        Going for a used FP4 should address both those concerns!

      • GandalftheBlack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        But you don’t need to buy a Fairphone to use /e/OS. You can install it for free on any supported phone, so it’s worth checking the website to see if your phone is supported. Switching to /e/OS has breathed new life into my Moto g 7 without having to spend a penny on hardware.

        • Turret3857@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I’m not sure why you mentioned /e/OS lol. I use iodeOS, I was using CalyxOS before that. I don’t feel entirely comfortable using /e/OS given their recent controversy with using OpenAI for STT. I want a fairphone because I dont want to buy a Pixel just to be able to relock my bootloader + I like their philosophy of carbon neutral phones w long support

      • jcarax@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Agreed, though if it weren’t for tariffs it wouldn’t be too expensive to ship from the likes of Clove Technologies. If the extra cost were going to Calyx instead of Murena I might pull the trigger.