• theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes I agree, if we can move the goalposts where ever we want, you might have a point for your own narrow view. But there will be people that believe what it delivers to be suitable for playing the games they want to play, in which case it won’t be underpowered. Which means its status as underpowered… is debatable.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      It can definitely be good enough for many people - that doesn’t make it not underpowered though. You don’t seem to understand the concept, or the difference between value and underpowered.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        You don’t seem to understand that “underpowered” requires context. Nor do you that what we’re having here is a debate, thus making it debatable nevertheless.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Saying because we’re debating it means it’s not debatable doesn’t work like that. That’s like saying it’s debatable that the earth is round.

          Underpowered already has context - it’s 2025 and it already won’t be able to play lots of steam games, let alone “next gen” games. It’s less powerful than the consoles it’s attempting to compete with………which came out 5 years ago.

          It’s underpowered.