• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    🤞pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite🤞

    I’m going to install CachyOS, an Arch-based distro

    oh god dammit

    • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      CachyOS has been flawless on my S/O’s desktop. From an easy install to plenty of documentation available, I couldn’t have asked for much more. During install, there’s an entire step dedicated to checking a box if you want to play games. (To enable non-free drivers).

      I don’t think it was a poor choice.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They didn’t say it required documentation, they said it had plenty of documentation should you need it.

            • Mesophar@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Damnit, you’re right!

              But for real, I think you misunderstand the point of documentation. Even if something were truly, literally flawless, having documentation would still be a net gain. It isn’t only to fix something when it goes wrong, but explains how things are working. If the only way for something to be literally flawless in your world view is for it to be so self explanatory that an idiot seeing it for the first time still understands it perfectly, nothing in computing can be flawless in that way.

              The pedantry on this point is so unhelpful as to be actively harmful to the rest of the discussion.

            • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Just a heads up- You appear to be interpreting things in a strictly literal sense.

              Some people might view this as trolling.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Cachy’s not that bad for beginners. I just did a test install on an old Nvidia PC, and it works for gaming OOTB.

      We’ve come a looooong way from Manjaro. I wouldn’t wish Manjaro on my worst enemy, to be clear.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bazzite is much worse for a new user then cachy. Worse documentation and a load of quirks from being immutable.

      Frankly they would be better off with mint unless they need very up to date hardware support for like a laptop.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I installed CachyOS for a weekend and it’s now been several months. I love it.

        But I would never, ever recommend it to a new user. It still requires someone to be comfortable on the command line and it’s possible to break it if you don’t know what you’re doing.

        Bazzite just works. You install it and start logging into your accounts. It’s nearly impossible for a newcomer to break, and perfect for the vast majority of new Linux users.

        Recommending Cachy to new users hurts not only those users but the entire Linux ecosystem.

        I don’t recommend Mint, either, but only because I am a KDE cultist, I hate Cinnamon, and every time I’ve tried it on anything I’ve had frustrating hardware issues that I have never had on Fedora.

        I’m BlameTheAntifa and I have a distro-hopping addiction.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bazzite is good for people who break their computer constantly because it’s harder to break. Cachy is better for people who can be trusted with sudo

        • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I broke CachyOS once and have learned to be more careful. First distro in 25 years so lots of learning to do. Was on Windows until 10 EOL.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’M FED UP, GOING TO INSTALL LINUX!

      • picks a complicated distro where you really need to read the manual or do some heavy google searches to do gaming *

      I’M FED UP, THIS IS TOO HARD, I’M GOING BACK TO WINDOWS!

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you want to use arch for the first time use an already setup distro like Manjaro.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Honestly, Day 1’ers, I’d rather they run Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, or Fedora. There are strong communities that are noob friendly. Go ahead and install Steam, get some games working, get their feet wet. 99% of the time, they don’t need more than basic stuff. Once they’re over being afraid of not being in windows, then start distro hopping to whatever they want.

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I can really suggest Mint for beginners simply because it has an UI for about everything you need somewhat regularly. This means, that you can use GUIs to get familiar and aren’t forced to know your way around the terminal. Its the Ideal beginner Distros (at least from my experience)

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s exactly it though. For most people using an OS isn’t about using the OS but about getting stuff done.

              I don’t run an OS because I love writing config files and running obscure CLI commands. I run an OS because I want a working browser, text editor, development setup and games. The OS is nothing but a means to an end.

              If I want to tinker, I got dozens of more fun projects in my life than trying to setup an OS.

              And if there’s a good GUI way to do what I need, that’s a win, not a downside.

              To put it differently: Do you want a hackable microwave that you can tweak and modify, where you can swap out the guts at any time, or do you want a microwave that heats your food? Most people are in the second camp, and PCs are just like microwaves a tool to get things done.

              Not being forced to know your way around the terminal is an absolute win. Don’t be afraid, nobody’s going to take your CLI from you. It will always still exist. But dumping on people who don’t want to tinker but want their stuff to work without having to google and read through manuals is just elitism and nothing to be proud of.

    • atmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you looking for fellow Bazzite users? (I’m one of them)

      Good to meet you brother/sister! We walk a rather lonesome road but glad I stand alongside you