• Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is a stupid argument. First, the ESRB is not the dictator of who plays what games. They are a recommendation group. Parents may want to consider what they say, but it should not be left at that. For example, sexual content is much worse than violent content in their eyes, and I’m sure we all agree that’s stupid.

      Second, kids play CS and TF2. We all know this, and Valve knows this. That’s not a bad thing, even if they’re rated M. I don’t think they do any harm, and CS at least probably does some good, with learning teamwork and stuff. Valve then uses their platform to push gambling, which is wrong (it’s psychologically manipulative, when they could just sell skins outright without manipulation) regardless of age, but particularly bad if they aren’t trying to prevent kids from participating, and they aren’t.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The only expection is AO rated games. That rating actually does carry legal requirements and restrictions. There’s a big reason it’s used so infrequently.

        M rated games are only 17+ it’s for minors. There’s no legal restrictions. AO is 18+ and actually does carry legal requirements to sell.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, Valve made M-rated games, it’s the parents’ responsibility to not have kids playing them.
            I know, they’re Parents, these unblamable entities, but here we are, sex has consequences.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                5 months ago

                Valve bears a legal, ethical, and moral culpability

                No, only legal. The other responsibilities are the parents’, which i bet you won’t consider culpable at all if their kids start to smoke.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            I agree that they started a machine that was unnecessary and it is repugnant; I still blame parents for any children involved.

            Never have I seen any minor targeting from Valve.