archive.today and archive.ph (also .is, .md, .fo, .li, .vn) could be Russian assets.

  • 3 Posts
  • 252 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 5th, 2025

help-circle







  • Nowadays people say it’s advanced stuff for powerusers, but just a decade ago this was the way for everybody: download audio to your computer, sync some of it to mobile devices, listen on the go. Everybody did it, OSs had dedicated software that got activated as soon as you plugged the device in etc.

    I hate the “convenience factor” or “non-technical user” arguments.






  • I obviously do understand why people use Spotify.

    But you are correct; my phone has 128GB internal storage, my hard drive music collection is smaller than that. There has been solutions for syncing (a curated list of) music to mobile devices for a long time. There are many - and frankly much better - ways to discover new music outside of Spotify. There are some really cool music only internet radio stations out there.
    And I’m not even talking about self-hosting, which simply cannot be recommended to everyone.

    People defending Spotify always come back to convenience, and always dismiss the disdvantages of generated playlists, and downplay the suckness of AI content. And never acknowledge that alternatives exist, right down to NOT using a music streaming service.



  • Sam Altman Is Still a Bullshit Machine

    Just like all billionaire tech bros: totally removed from reality, living in their own bubbles of unimaginable wealth and loneliness. They convinced themselves that the constant grift is real and call it a utopia… please, someone take their dangerous toys (and most of their wealth) away. And since the government certainly isn’t going to step in


  • Nothing miraculous:

    One way Wikipedians are sloshing through the muck is with the “speedy deletion” of poorly written articles, as reported earlier by 404 Media. A Wikipedia reviewer who expressed support for the rule said they are “flooded non-stop with horrendous drafts.” They add that the speedy removal “would greatly help efforts to combat it and save countless hours picking up the junk AI leaves behind.” Another says the “lies and fake references” inside AI outputs take “an incredible amount of experienced editor time to clean up.”

    Typically, articles flagged for removal on Wikipedia enter a seven-day discussion period during which community members determine whether the site should delete the article. The newly adopted rule will allow Wikipedia administrators to circumvent these discussions if an article is clearly AI-generated and wasn’t reviewed by the person submitting it.


    The Wikimedia Foundation is also actively developing a non-AI-powered tool called Edit Check that’s geared toward helping new contributors fall in line with its policies and writing guidelines. Eventually, it might help ease the burden of unreviewed AI-generated submissions, too. Right now, Edit Check can remind writers to add citations if they’ve written a large amount of text without one, as well as check their tone to ensure that writers stay neutral.

    Remember that a spell checker also works completely without AI. Computers can do advanced stuff without LLMs.