The first decision has to be vim/emacs.
The first decision has to be vim/emacs.
I don’t disagree exactly, but I’d argue that you’re contributing to the project even if you’re just reporting bugs or helping others with it on e.g. Lemmy.
I could see avoiding all of that pragmatically in order to use some obscure, critical software, but not something you use every day and for which there are reasonable alternatives.
It’s kind of absurd. When you buy a TV, the bloated adware at least helps lower the price. Imagine paying extra for it.
Fair enough, most of that isn’t something a user should have to worry about.
VT is just Virtual Terminals. You always have one of them active, and in most distros you can switch to others by Ctrl-Alt-F1 through F12. In some distos it’s just Alt-F1.
So if you press Ctrl-Alt-F2 you should be brought to a text login. For crazy historical reasons you may have to either press Ctrl-Alt-F1 or Ctrl-Alt-F7 to get back to your usual graphical session.
Arch docs for example: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Linux_console
I would try:
I just started using finamp a couple of weeks ago and this inspired me to install the beta.
If I find any problems I’ll try to get involved on the repository. Discord is a bit of a turnoff though.
Possibly, but I’m not very familiar with wordpress.
I imagined something like:
https://nextcloud.com/partners/
The idea is that I could pay someone to admin the same services that they provide to the public.
So like maybe lemmy.world and the other popular instances could offer a Lemmy instance, and maybe also offer: matrix, pixelfed, mastodon, etc etc.
There are decent options out there for mainstream services like email, web, etc. but maybe not for more niche services like lemmy.
I’ve been wondering if there’s an opportunity for instance admins (e.g. lemmy.world) to offer managed instances for user domains.
It would be great if it was easier for the average person to own a domain and use it for email, matrix, Lemmy, etc.
#bookz on undernet is what I’ve used in the past.
Have you checked these all on winehq? It would be nice for them to be reported with logs if they haven’t already.
Garmin Express for example is on there with some discussion here: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=40213
It might not help in the short term, but even just having logs for more broken programs could be useful for the wine project.
Did you grep that log file for ‘amdgpu’?
I wonder if the error is related to this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/229108
I’m still using x11 on my system. Maybe try that and see if it works?
No, I haven’t seen anything like that. That’s odd.
I’ve had those errors on my system for years. I never thought that they were NixOS specific. I just assumed something to do with a buggy firmware:
Enabled 4 GPEs in block 00 to 1F
ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.GPP2.PTXH.RHUB.POT3._PLD due to previous error (AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ELEMENT) (20240322/psparse-529)
[x~20]
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-ff])
I don’t notice any ill-effects from them, so it may be a red herring. I have a:
$ < /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/board_name
ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING
with a 5900X.
I don’t usually see as many prints as you have there, but it’s quite a few, and the number seems to vary (grow?) over time. I keep meaning to investigate it, but haven’t got around to it.
I think you should keep looking in your logs for other problems. If you can share the full log I’d be happy to take a look.
Am I just failing to use that site properly, or is it missing a ton of stuff in ‘replays’ that was available live?
I feel like the CBC had a better version of this thing 12 years ago.
The original error actually makes it sound like there’s a partition on hda that’s bigger than hda itself.
It probably becomes CPU limited with those other compression algorithms.
You could use something like atop
to find the bottleneck.
Have you checked all the ethernet links are actually connected at 1G and not 100M?
Sounds like it’s not really a downgrade, but just an unreleased beta or test build? That seems a little less sketchy, and maybe it’ll be generally released at some point.
I’d probably:
systemctl suspend
When the screen fails to wake, are you able to get it back by powering it off, or by unplugging it? Is it X or wayland?
This was on my mind, but then I just watched it yesterday.