• 0 Posts
  • 136 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 26th, 2021

help-circle


  • This article confirms my own experiences with AI. I spend a lot more time reviewing, reprompting, and tweaking than I save on coding. Having to double check or fight it to get what I want is not a time saver. Not to say that it doesn’t save time when it is right, but the thing that I never seem to get across to proponents of AI is that anytime I need to reprompt or refine, I have lost. I have officially wasted time at this point compared to simply referencing the documentation. Unless I’m generating a significant portion of code which only needs minor tweaks. I’m generally not saving time.




  • D_Air1@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlFan of Flatpaks ...or Not?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used them for some things, but other things still don’t work quite right. Take Steam for example. I do love flatpaks for testing out apps, things with really finicky dependencies, or pinning a specific version of a software that I want to continue to work in the future. However, for most things, Arch + AUR just covers all my needs without any hiccups.

    To me flatpaks are sort of like NixOS. All the benefits they provide aren’t something I need on a daily basis. Rolling back works just fine 99% of the time with downgrade. I already have system backups. Despite what some articles might insist, things don’t just break all the time. I’m not running untrusted software.

    Basically no solution is perfect, but they don’t need to be. If the benefits I gain can be recreated through other methods without the tradeoffs they introduce, then I will go with that. Of course, that isn’t to say they don’t have their place, but sometimes I feel like some people think that “being designed from the ground up” to handle certain use cases is always better than whatever “cobbled together” thing we currently have and that isn’t always the case. I’m specifically quoting those two phrases because these are the exact phrases you will hear projects using to justify their existence. In fact, I would go so far as to say that some people have outright confused modularity for “cobbled together”.

    One last example I want to make is that I make use of projects like the fish shell and helix editor. In these cases, I find the features they introduce to be worth the tradeoffs and work better because of being designed “from the ground up” to do what they do. However, I don’t make use of immutable systems, containers such as docker, or say filesystems such as btrfs. The features they provide are not useful enough to me compared to the problems they introduce.













  • Is this actually a bug though? I just don’t think krunner or many other calculators for that matter use delimiters anymore. Therefore, the only thing it is changing based on regional settings is the use of the comma or period to denote a decimal.

    I could be wrong considering I had a bit of trouble understanding the post. I just bring this up because in American English there are no delimiters for thousands place or above either.

    Also I don’t see how from this post the decimal point is wrong. Sure it is simplified to one decimal place, but again many calculators do this. Perhaps op simply needs something that provides more fine grained control over number formatting than what krunner is supposed to.


  • I too enjoy what the BSD’s offer, but always find it ironic that it is always come company complaining about the gpl. Reading the post there are certain instances where it comes off as “We would contribute it we weren’t forced too”.

    Furthermore, I would really like to find what specific things have companies like this contributed to the BSD’s. I know of a handful of companies that use BSD like Sony and Apple, but it is hard to tell sometimes what their involvement is. To a certain degree, I would expect the BSD’s to be much further along than they are if these companies are really doing so much.