Indeed, sorry. Crazy this still hasn’t been addressed. It’s a really important security check

They do have reproducible builds for android though? https://signal.org/blog/reproducible-android/

They can’t for iOS because it’s just not a feature there

Else, there’s Molly you can use, but yea, Signal doesn’t like it

Ragebait

So you’re just going to throw the creativity aspect of it, or that it is right a good portion of the time?

You’re going to ignore the gigantic demand for AI, and the thousands of people that have a productivity gain from it?

All tools have issues. AI doesn’t have to be the one tool that’s either all or nothing. If you approach it with a neutral angle and try to work with it the right way, I’m sure you’ll benefit from it. Some basic uses are really good:

• Summarizing text
• Proposing better or alternative wording
• Inventing short paragraphs, stories, other similar stuff
• mimicking a style
• knowledge and questions about basic and broadly known subjects
• asking for similar tools or notions
• speech recognition, and text to speech (still limited)
• image editing
• Bug fixing (software recommendations, centralized diagnostics (still limited but faster and easier))
• quickly getting infos on a subject that are easy to understand (limited, just like searching on internet without taking the time to search more)
• much more

They won’t, because their opinion is political and ideological, not technical

Affirmations without argumentation can be dismissed without argumentation

Saying AI is a sorting algorithm is just inaccurate. What can I say apart from its just not how it works? Anyone who studied that field knows how much they’re dishonest. They are just too many possibilities and types of AI to list them all

At this point a video game is just a glorified sorting algorithm of pixels of color

If they weren’t trained on the same data, it ends up similar

Training inferior models with superior models output can lower the gap between both. It’ll not be optimal by any means and you might fuck its future learning, but it will work to an extent

The data you feed it should be good quality though

Brave’s AI search results are pretty good

I don’t dislike AI generated videos as long as they are funny with some meta (making fun of the absurdity of what characters do for example - the brainrot potential is unlimited)

Enjoy being downvoted for being right

I love the arguments: none

AI is broader than LLMs

When you’re attacking an entire field with no arguments, and saying it’s shit based on your feelings rather than facts, expect people to disagree

Sure, that mainly applies when it’s the same model training on itself. If a model trains on a different one, it might retrieve some good features from it, but the bad sides as well

the harder it is for AI developing companies to improve on previous models.

They all use each other’s data to improve. That’s federated learning!

In a way, it’s good because it helps have more competition

Yea, it’s often really fucking cheap for the value, just like streaming services to an extent

Customer service AI sucks, I think we can all agree to this

But if you really believe that ChatGPT and Gemini is mainly for generating art, then you’re completely wrong

It is though

Same thinking as people who hate crypto for a part of it

They just sound completely dumb, yet it’s the majority of people here

For a place that welcomes people, inclusivity and hate discrimination, there’s a lot of generalization

That’s… not how it works. ML is AI also…

Don’t talk about things you don’t understand, please, to avoid misinforming other

Works relatively well for image editing

Else yea I would agree, sometimes it’s just shoved for nothing, but 90% seems like too much

*because you don’t know how to use it

Less but yea, many are anti AI here