Does your network not support UPnP? You shouldn’t normally need to port forward in order to seed a torrent, unless your network prevents NAT traversal.

Xournal++

Ok, seems fine.

Out of curiosity, what’s the output of # dmesg | grep iwlwifi?

A bug report has been submitted for that here.

It is.

Its not used with e2ee, is it though? At least it’s not the default and I doubt it can even be enabled.

It depends on what the defaults are for the client that you are using. Element, for example, defaults to E2EE.

Another thing is that e.g. spammers might choose to use a misleading preview. Though I suppose that’s a minor point, probably server-side previews can be tricked as well.

In my opinion this isn’t a huge deal, but you do have a point in that it could be an attack vector for phishing.

Borg good

You can still edit it.

What is the security/privacy flaw if the server does it? No point thinking a non-encrypted would be very secret in the first place.

What do you mean? Matrix supports E2EE.

I guess the idea is that this works with simpler clients as well. Other nessaging networks with initiator-side previews usually have single-provider clients, as far as I know.

I mean, it’s up to the client to implement URL previews, anyways; if the client is simple, then the client wouldn’t implement them. Unless you mean that the simple client should still provide other people that have non-simple clients URL previews, which would only be accomplished if the server generated them.

I certainly could link my server into play as well just to keep an always online device in the mix

Yep! That should work perfectly fine.

Neat idea! Although, it would probably be more practical to use a centralized model since if one peer is offline, then the syncing would not occur. That is, if my assumption is correct that you are thinking of directly syncing between 2 devices.

I was more referring to what entity is forming the request, not how the preview is generated from a technological standpoint.

I found this documentation which outlines the possible methods, but, from what I can see, it doesn’t specify what one is actually used in practice. I was also unable to find any information in the Matrix spec.

I have found that instances that do seem to modify the source code just use the existing “Code” link and simply point it to their own repo instead.

What bugs are you encountering with KDE Connect?

I use Nextcloud’s Calendar to sync to other calendar apps over CalDAV.

occ files:scan --all (or something like that)

I have already done this, as was mentioned in the post.

I enabled that in /var/snap/nextcloud/current/nextcloud/config/config.php with 'filesystem_check_changes' => 1,, but it did not fix the issue. It did seem to remove one error that was popping up, but I am still getting a prompt stating that the file could not be created (which is strange because, when I did a file scan, it shows that they were created), and the files are still not displayed.

It should also be noted that I restart nextcloud after applying the changes with # snap restart nextcloud.

Tried this. Still nothing.

for example to 777 as a temporary solution

Just tried this, and still nothing.

# chmod -R 777 data-directory