

Chromium? More like copium. /j
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Chromium? More like copium. /j
[…] I hope it’s really coming🤞
A change regarding Peertube federation with Lemmy certainly does appear to be coming in Lemmy 1.0 [1], but it’s currently unknown to me if it does actually fix the issue.
#5509 fixes this, it will be released as part of Lemmy 1.0
I can’t wait until Lemmy’s Peertube integration is released [1]. Then, iiuc, this comment section should be able to happen directly on The Linux Experiment’s videos within Lemmy.
I’m not really sure what the point of this is. Why not just create communities on Lemmy for those listed topics?
[Tesseract is] a Photon fork.
TIL that Tesseract is a Photon Fork. Would you know, by chance, at what point in Photon’s development it was forked to form Tesseract, and what the rationale was?
l a p p i e s
That’s pretty neat!
You’re welcome! 😊
IDK if they’re “Fediverse specific”, but I love SSTF’s (@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world) art.
HA, that’s so cursed. I love it.
the streaming in an SS uniform […]
Do you have a source?
[…] it doesn’t remove admins from the equation and users still have to choose an instance to be associated with […]
I think that’s a fair point! At any rate, I do agree with you in that I think that users should be completely portable for a truly sustainable federated service.
It could be done without having to clone all data though. Reddit is hosted by AWS and their data is distributed on multiple servers, so replace AWS by a bunch of people like you and me providing disk space for the data and tada, you can decentralized the database and just give people access to interacting with it directly (through code) or via various front-ends that people would create. […]
If I understand you correctly, there is an open issue for Lemmy for an, I think, similar idea of co-hosting communities.
[…] they’re always using the same credentials no matter the website they use and no matter the website they can interact with everything that ever happened on the servers, no one has the power to prevent users from seeing some of the transactions that happened (no admins) because the website they use are just a front used to simplify interaction with the servers. […]
Hm, IIUC, this is one of Bluesky’s issues that the linked blog post was pointing out — if joining the network requires one to mirror all existing data, it makes it prohibitively expensive for anyone to spin up a server to join the network if the size of the network is enormous.
If things were decentralized in similar way to crypto it would be way better for user adoption.
IIUC, are you perhaps referring to something like Nostr?
🐻 “it’s not. it’s not. it’s not. …”
🐻 “it’s not. it’s not. it’s not. …”
🐻 “it’s not. it’s not. it’s not. …”
/j
Oh damn, that’s a lot of cross-posts. I didn’t know this had already been posted so many times before.
Interesting — I hadn’t considered it that way.
I take the issue of misinformation seriously. I try to be the change that I wish to see.
Lemmy [1]
References