deleted by creator

I can’t say anything about it’s quality, but Wikibooks has German.

Looks like it may be worthwhile as a or an additional starting resource, but maybe not more.

Nothing is an annoying, confusing brand name.

yt-dlp supports various sites and authentication options (may have to take over from webbrowser). I don’t see an explicit extractor in the source, but it may work anyway. It’s what I’d try first.

the five topics: aliases, commit template, ssh key password manager, GitHub cli gh, configure diff/merge tool

(Because I am checking on them anyway, I’ll add the links and desc:)

RiMusic GitHub, Teaser Website, Izzy, F-Droid

A multilingual Android application for streaming music from YouTube Music.

Beatbump, GitHub

Alternative YouTube Music frontend built with Svelte/SvelteKit

I looked at Movies Anywhere and

• US only
• Movies bought only (no series, does not support rentals)
• sounds like they offer a unified interface to multiple providers - but you’re saying it unlocks the bought movies on the other platforms? - if it’s only a frontend it’d not help in keeping access

What’s the difference then?

Is it the same software, a rebrand, a publishing team change?

Did you just make a contradictory argument for both sides?

Is your distinction that piracy by individuals gives cultural recognition while that of corporations doesn’t?

If you think piracy is warranted, at the cost of artists/creators, how is a generalized AI that makes it available and more accessible as a cultural abstracted good different?

Why did you post a screenshot instead of posting/quoting the text?

Text would have been more accessible and more discoverable.

A crack changes program code and is executed. There is no easy way to check if it is safe.

Unless you inspect the source code or binary code (directly or through reverse-engineering) you can not verify it.

What’s left without that is attempts at gaining confidence through analysis trust of third parties - the providers, distributors, creators - who have to be confirmed beyond a matching text label too.

The alternative to or extension of being confidently safe or accepting the risk is to sandbox the execution. Run the crack in a restricted environment with limited access in case it does things you do not want to. Optionally monitoring what it does. Which has to be put into relation of what the program does without the crack.

“no warranty” is very different from “expect bugs and breakage”

It tells me they’re not confident in or trying for stability. Which means I have to expect issues and fix up time requirements. Which I’m not willing to invest regularly.

Looks like a video game.

From how it looks I assume the “boost” is an AI filter?

Smearing/Smudging was obvious when you looked for it, as well as artifacts on edges on movement.

Do you see more than with your eyes? I doubt it. Otherwise it could’ve been interesting as a live viewing aid.

Seems like it’s application would be very niche and situational. And only if you’re willing to accept visual artifacts (rather than having a “truthful”/quality as possible video.

• ⚠️ Expect bugs and breaking changes.
• ⚠️ Do not use the app as the only way to store your photos and videos.

Well that’s not very confidence-inducing…

Why are they calling it diff debugging?

They mention git (and only gitas a tool), so why not call it bisect like git does?

I extensively use interactive rebase, edit and squash, to structure my changes and shorten/simplify my WIP changes when I’m confident in the approach etc.

You got it wrong.

See the linked post. Transcription has been available for premium users for a while now.

Now free users get two per week too.

transcribe voice messages for free

Not really. It’s limited to two per week.

With this update, all users can convert up to 2 messages per week into text

Official Telegram release blog post.

4 This Article does not apply to computer programs.

What makes Software different? Is there specific law for it?