Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.

So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.

It requires drill down now and doesn’t list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

There isn’t, because you cannot prove a Lemmy user’s gender to enforce this. You can only moderate the content.

It would be, if it were comprehensive and applicable to match making, but I don’t think for most people that can be gleaned from fedi. Most people only lurk, few even directly follow communities, and the content people do interact with likely does not represent them well unless they put themselves out there like that.

Just like match and okc you’d have to take a quiz and match against core values. Social media data mining would be a terrible way of matching.

But we’d have to do the math and figure out how to actually pay for government services. It’s a nice thought, but there is no way this would work. You’d need a ton of other tax reform, and even then I don’t think we’d come close. The end result would be mandatory consumption taxes for all public services, which would end as the same amounts we pay now.

S10+ with mst pay is the greatest of all time. Like 50-70% of places still don’t have tap to pay. Mst still works at 80-90% of no tap venues.

Delusional, how is this upvoted? You’re stealing value from the holder. You get something you shouldn’t have, and they do not get something they should have. Let’s call it what it is even if some don’t believe the system is fair.

Buying should be ownership to use for personal use in perpetuity. So in that sense downloading a copy of something you’ve paid a purchase license for should never be illegal.