I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides

Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?

JK we all know the answer … 🤡

Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves

Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content

If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight

No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)

Rare Australia W

There’s a lot of really bad slop on YouTube. Your algorithm might be curated to “documentaries”, but that’s far from the norm

Putting a title on it (I.e. “Big beautiful bill”) doesn’t mean it is a big, beautiful bill.

I’m not skeptical of DEI because I’m against “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, I’m skeptical because of piss poor implementations of it I see in the workforce

These responses closely mirrored examples of the false claim from pro-China sources, which alleged that Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was suppressing opposition voters by deliberately withholding voter notifications.

There’s two things at play here. First, all models being released these days have safety built into the training. In the West, we might focus on preventing people from harming others or hacking, and in China, they’re preventing people from getting politically supportive of China. But in a way, we are all “exporting” our propaganda.

Second, as called out in the article, these responses are clearly based on the training data. That is where the misinformation starts, and you can’t “fix” the problem without first fixing that data.

Hopefully this helps create precedent to stop enforcing copyright for everyone

haha ur so brave

I know it’s popular to hate on LLMs here at Lemmy, but what is “Artificial Intelligence” if not “Counterfeiting Thought”? Those words map to each other pretty nicely

Sorry?

1. I can afford good clothes now
2. High quality clothes last a long time
3. Having a Ubuntu shirt is a good conversation starter
4. I would rather have a Tux logo than a Nike one
5. Giving 5$ to KDE makes gives me the false sense of real contribution to the project

Why does this have so many up votes

But it will make me pay for VPNs!

Chinas exports might not be huge for China, but they’re huge for the rest of the world

And despite building all our shit, they still actually pollute less CO2 per capita: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/

From what I understand, xorg has fundamental security flaws. How will they remedy this?

They won’t. Don’t download random shit and if you’re worried, run it in Flatpak

What happens when the Linux kernel drops support for xorg? Do they intend to fork an older version of the kernel in order to keep support?

Not really possible, since X11 is only built on top of the kernel’s graphical interface (same as Wayland). Even if that wasn’t the case, the kernel doesn’t delete any code that anybody uses (that’s why 30 year old programs still run)

The first comment on the request

For the sake of all of our sanity, I’d really appreciate if FESCo could decide on this one really quickly (e.g. putting out a statement) and avoid what could be a most unpleasant flame-fest on this mailing list.