How can they know it’s your data without first collecting your data to compare it?

“Give us your personal information so we can ask others to delete your personal information” just doesn’t sound like a trustworthy offer.

Here’s some popular content

They don’t even try to show you anything relevant. “Here’s some random shit, watch it instead.”

Did they actually issue a subpoena though, or did they just send some emails saying “give pls”.

A subpoena is a legal document and thus there are rules that go along with it. But an email asking to be given something is not a subpoena.

Has piped ever actually worked for you? I try to watch something on piped every couple weeks on desktop, and regularly on mobile because of the bot, and the videos … just don’t play. It’s just never worked.

You were foolish to have ever given it up in the first place.

I love Manjaro :'(

It’s like arch except it doesn’t break all the time. And it has a great hardware and kernel utility, and still has access to the AUR. And I like pacman a lot better than apt.

Gnome and kde are horrible for that. Mobile UX on a desktop platform is terrible to use.

Why the fuck does a desktop app have a hamburger menu though.

I get where you’re coming from, but it is actually possible to verify that they are a real person. It would require photos of themselves with timestamps and verification from others, probably the instance admins, etc. All for a silly reason. But it is possible.

Corporations Executives are always happy to pander to morality … Corporations Executives are equally happy to make choices that most would consider immoral, if it meets their goals.

Remember there are actual people who are making these decisions. Don’t let them hide behind some abstract legal concept, that’s part of their play.

Tragedy of the commons.

“I’ve heard of that, let’s use it!”

Please please please tell your bosses how stupid that attitude is.

The native advertising has already arrived on Lemmy. Tis a day of sorrow.

What kind of complicated UX do you think is necessary here? I literally said “a simple chronological list” is all they need to improve the experience enough to make me listen.

That should take ten minutes of coding. And it is applicable to every podcast ever.

This such an elaborate excuse for such a simple mistake that would be so easy to fix.

It is very VERY simple to set up a functional website these days. And this is an abomination of UX. It would take hardly any effort at all to improve it with a simple chronological list of links.

I don’t think I’m being too hard on them at all.

That intrigued me, but the shit design of the website turned me off. I can’t even find the first episode. There’s no list, it’s blurbs of each and every episode that you have to scroll through and it only loads like 15 at a time then you have to go to the next page.

I’m not going to spend ten minutes scrolling and clicking just to find the first episode so I can try it.