Sure, but she knows it as well, and I doubt she’d risk her life thusly.

Now imagine at best halving the physical space for that hall battery by adding a waterproof USB-C port and associated PD electronics - which at that scale would mean significantly more than a 50% reduction in battery life.

She would not survive that.

The last gen iPod nano touted a 30-hour battery life. Also, you don’t need to peg the CPU for rendering audio - this can be accomplished with a very low-power DSP. The lack of radios also offers significant savings when compared to a smart watch, which you forgot needs to be able to receive notifications, not just wait for low-power sensor input.

I’ve professionally developed the firmware for several embedded systems and consumer electronics devices with very strict power requirements.

Right, my point is that we want to use that space for battery, not bulky connectors.

Linux

With vastly lower power requirements compared to a smartwatch

don’t give them ideas

At that scale, the connector and the necessary electronics are too large.

That tracks, it’s already slopware.

Expert systems are a great example of AI perfectly suited for medical applications. A hallucinating chatbot has very limited utility, even where such technology is already in use; one of my wife’s physicians’ Dax Copilot likes to invent inaccurate details, for example.

They’re working on it, but it’s not complete. Try again.

The cars they sell are operational, champ.

Those cars also do not have L4 autonomy.

Yes, operating. Words don’t cut it. Tesla’s been lying about their systems for years.

You’re right in that I mistyped L4.

I don’t see VW operating anything with L54 autonomy.

Who is it outside?

Literally anyone [still] in the autonomous vehicle market is ahead of Tesla. They’re a joke.

Do whatever you want with the money, just slap “AI” on any of the marketing material you send to the dipshit investors.

Brock “Allen” Turner, the rapist?

Don’t be surprised that fascists use the fascist megaphone.