

Curious question, why would IPv6 introduce additional latency?
Curious question, why would IPv6 introduce additional latency?
It’s not like the malicious actors have stopped looking… If they are finding fewer vulnerabilities, it sounds to me they should be paying more.
That’s a penis dot gif
From my understanding, the impetus was that F5 submitted a CVE for a vulnerability, for an optional, “beta” feature that can be enabled. Dounin did not think a CVE should be submitted, since he did not considered it to be “production” feature.
That said, the vulnerability is in shipping code, regardless of whether it is optional or not, so per industry coding practices, it should either be patched or removed entirely in order to resolve the issue.
While I appreciate this, there were far too many questions, which were pretty technical for a layperson. And even after picking the most basic options, I was still presented with like six variants of Ubuntu, including Mint and Elementary.
How about something like:
TrueNAS has an OpenVPN plugin available, which is typically the recommended option.
They are literally published by Microsoft.
Check out this list:
https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted?tab=readme-ov-file#blogging-platforms
Or
https://github.com/awesome-selfhosted/awesome-selfhosted?tab=readme-ov-file#content-management-systems-cms