I mean the content is hosted under a license that doesn’t allow commercial exploitation without permission.

But this doesn’t stop meta because copyright laws don’t apply to them, see the over 2000 porn movies that they torrented

It’s almost irrelevant to subscribe to a channel, the algorithm anyway pushes whatever it wants ignoring your requests

Unless the instance owner is a network god, they blacklist the IP address almost immediately (they see thousands of videos watched at the same time from the same IP address, trivial to detect)

Hence the part “nobody noticed” in the headline

Yes even meta noticed that the qualityof videos on peertube is increased, they’re illegally scraping all the content for training their closed source for-profit ai video generator

How the government can use the bribe for R&D?

At most can get a “mom: we have deepseek at home” meme model

Coretemp and Ethernet. Also a few years ago the guy that maintained meshcentral (the only reason to pay extra $$$ for having Intel vPro compatibile computers in the workspace)

Basically this tells their biggest customers “next server needs to be based on AMD epyc”

How much money they could possibly “save” with those THREE salaries? Just cut one week of travel with private jet for the C class and the same savings are served

Didn’t the orange one threaten tsmc to buy 49% of Intel or will get higher tariffs?

The engraving is irrelevant as the main glass piece will “accidentally” fall down and break, the 24k gold stand then would be put in storage where it will be “lost” and smelted down to a clean untraceable ingot

That’s how this import tax work.

Ever wondered why converse shoes have felt on the sole? Because in this way they’re “by tariff definition” slippers, and slippers have less tax than shoes.

https://www.upworthy.com/why-converse-have-felt-lining

Serious or trolling?

You said:

If you manufactured it in the USA there are no tariffs. I don’t know why this is so hard to understand.

Then I explained to you why it works like this:

Manufactured in the USA = tariffs and expensive labor.

Manufactured outside the USA = tariffs and cheap labor.

It’s really that simple.

Tariffs on everything is an incentive on manufacturing outside the USA as the supply chain is missing and all the parts need to be imported too.

The story would be different if those were targeted tariffs on specific products. In that case it would work in the opposite way

there’s a youtube video from “smarter every day” that showed his attempt to make something 100% in the USA.

The item was just a barbecue scrubber, with just a few components.

He needed a simple screw… NOBODY made that in the US…

He needed a simple plastic knob… NOBODY made that in the US (he bought 10k “american” knobs but once arrived there was a MADE IN COSTA RICA sign)

He wanted to make injection molds in the US… NOBODY did that, he had to find some retired expert to help him.

So, if you assemble stuff in US, you still need to import EVERYTHING, paying the same tariff and with more expensive labor. Tariffs need to be carefully considered and target a specific item in order to have some positive effect

tariffs are over the final product, not the individual components inside that product.

For example Ford was making a cargo van in turkey, but thanks to the chicken tax that they themselves lobbied for, a cargo van made in turkey would have a 25% tariff. Solution: make passenger vans in turkey, import them with 0% tariff, then pay an american to remove and send the passenger seats to the landfill and get a cargo van

He meant that this is a disincentive to manufacture a phone in the USA.

Phone built in china: 30% tariff on the total assembled unit (this week is 30% or it changed again?)

Phone built in USA: 30% tariff on all the components because they’re made in China, 100% tariff on the processor, AND spend 1000% more in assembling the device because finding, training and paying skilled workers is way more expensive

Maybe there might be an incentive to move production to a country different from China, but the situation changes too wildly. The risk of spend millions to move production to Vietnam to get a lower rate, then a week later Trump gets diarrhea from eating a bahn mi and imposes an immediate 50% tariff as revenge

Girls gone wild is still in activity? Didn’t they lost the lawsuit for coercing all those girls and even have some minor in their videos?

Fuck them

I think it’s Samsung that interpreted the rule at their advantage in a way that sends more devices to the landfill

The article isn’t really honest btw, it says indian company and very vaguely alludes to sanctions.

Only a link in the article explains that it’s a Russian company dealing with Russian oil

No, on aur there’s duckstation which is the old GPL3 version (stuck to one year ago) and duckstation-git which downloads that git with latest license and compiles on the end user machine. Both versions respect the dev intentions of “no packages” as it downloads the code and compiles it. The problem that it was about were probably two

1. Documentation on how to compile is insufficient. It depends on many libraries but doesn’t say which exact version which causes issues at compile. Someone did the guesswork and wrote “instructions” (the pkgbuild file) for everyone but it’s not the main dev and it breaks often

2. Because it downloads the code from git, it might be an issue if it’s not tagged correctly, users get the latest commit instead of latest release and that’s undesirable (didn’t check for this case, but it was an issue for other emulators where non devs could run buggy code and complain about non-issues)

It’s more a case by case situation, not universal. In a place where car thefts are rampant they wouldn’t offer that, for example

And the initial deposit is massive

the license change is invalid as it’s based from GPL3 code and previous contributors did not allow the change