A Huawei version of Android.

The rest of the planet: Me next!

https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1idseqb/deepseek_r1_671b_over_2_toksec_without_gpu_on/

I saw posts about people running it well enough for testing purposes on an NVMe.

My bones already hurt. Why would anybody want this?

Eh, chocolate-covered coffee beans aren’t bad, if they’re reasonably fresh. That’s not too different.

Really the only way you can do coffee wrong is if you boil it.

What nonsense do you hear about making coffee?

Everyone has their own way, but there’s no wrong way.

Yes, there’s a monochrome display in the middle. It’s kinda like a TI-86 calculator aimed at children.

Lemmy just can’t handle someone who’s anti-genocide

They can’t when that stance conflicts with their party. Hence why “The dems need to stop the genocide, people are not going to vote for genocide” gets you downvoted.

“fuck Biden for arming Israel” meme that has 1,500 upvotes

Those exist on .world? I see too many “You have to vote for genocide because trump would do genocide and also other bad things” type posts, it’d be weird if they coexisted.

can do some version, though, if you’re interested

Sure if it’s trivial I’d be interested, but don’t put too much work into it.

Maybe, but conservatism is considered much more acceptable among Americans than anything left of liberalism. Particularly now when the dems are trying to reach out to conservatives with policies such as closing the border, “tough on crime” rhetoric, unlimited support for Israel, etc. You can check by whether you’ve been banned from PleasentPolitics

legally” and “Illegal

Adding “this should be done according to the law” doesn’t divorce an action from its morality.

Rounding up millions of immigrants, some whom have been here for decades, and nearly all of whom are here because they’re fleeing the effects of the US constantly couping their governments and training/funding terrorists is an immoral action, whether they’re legal or illegal.

At one point I tried to illustrate with data just how big a jerk you have to be before it starts banning you. If you’re interested, I can start doing that again.

Would you?

My understanding is that downvotes reflect whether or not someone agrees with a post or comment much more than whether the user is making a constructive comment or not so they can only be used to infer how agreeable the comment is.

I’ve also offered to delve, for any user who feels that this has happened to them, into the breakdown of why they’re being ranked down, which almost always is because they’re being a jerk about their “dissenting” opinion, and not the opinion itself.

Use me as an example, I regularly get dozens of downvotes for such hot takes as “facilitating genocide hurts the dems chances of getting elected, we need them to stop that if we want them to win.”.

So it would delete people’s posts if they get downvoted a lot or if the poster tends to upvote heavily downvoted posts?

You’ve automated the suppression of dissenting voices.

Downvotes without any response: This is unpopular with this community, but probably correct.

Downvotes with responses: This was either contentious or wrong.

1 upvote, 0 downvotes, 10+ responses: You posted something really dumb, and Hexbear found out.

Why not try it, then remove the feature if it turns out toxic?

Are you suggesting Putin controlled CNN and Al Jazeera English 10 years ago?

Because I’m just recounting what I saw on the news.

Surely anyone who isn’t just begging for rivers of foreign blood must be a robot. Just inconceivable that anyone could want less bloodshed.

That was in 2014, there wasn’t even a coherent Ukrainian state and they were going through new presidents every month. A lot changed over the next 10 years. Western Ukraine was shelling Eastern Ukraine right up until the day of the invasion.

A state and it’s people’s interests aren’t the same.

Take self-determination movements; the people in eastern Ukraine want to leave, the state of Ukraine doesn’t want to give up territory.

Supporting the state in this case is opposing the people, supporting the people is opposing the state.

If I was in Russia, I’d have pointed at Syrian Kurdistan before the US invasion/occupation of Syria.

I think I see the disconnect, you conflate the safety of the state of Taiwan and Ukraine with the people so statements like “I don’t think we should sacrifice a million Ukrainians to weaken Russia” come off as undermining the defense of Ukraine.

I’m certain even the pro-independence people living in Taiwan would prefer status quo to looking like Ukraine.

Oh yeah, I forgot .world allows porn instances.