anbu141

There’s no need to argue; if that’s what you say, then so be it, my friend. I’m not trying to start a debate about which language is “better”—I’m simply pointing out which one is more comprehensive. Anyway, have it your way.

Let me ask a question, then: why were the Linux kernel and the Linux ecosystem written in C rather than Python? No matter what other language you might consider, nothing can truly take the place of C; if you are a software developer, you should already know this.

I actually like Rust too, and I’m not against it; however, C is currently the best-known programming language in the world. Still, I like your idea.

Yes, you are absolutely right. Regardless of how proficient an LLM (large language model) might be at documentation and coding, it remains just that—an LLM. If you write the documentation yourself, you can craft it in a way that is both engaging and humorous. I am not suggesting that we should avoid using LLMs altogether; I simply believe they should be used with moderation.

People used to say the same things about the Linux kernel, but its current state is actually quite good. In other words, C is a standard and robust language.

This could be a great idea; it’s a thousand times better than using LLVM.

We understand you perfectly well; Rust is fine, too, but no language can take the place of C. I mean, wouldn’t it have been better if it had been written in C?

Wouldn’t it be great to master a language like C while also grasping the logic behind other programming languages? I’m not entirely against artificial intelligence, but it’s completely useless—it’s absolute garbage.