Astroturfing is definitely a thing that exists but what evidence is there that palantir the company is spending resources that way?

Most companies have marketing and PR departments, not GCHQ and IDF veterans

Sorry I thought this was more common, it’s definitely wall Street bets

Put me in my place if this is nonsense but doesn’t it make way more sense if the astroturfing is done by WSB goons? I just don’t see corporate entities coordinating this kind of thing

I gave you the up vote because it’s a good take, but this really has nothing to do with the article, so I can tell that you and a bunch of your 58 up voters didn’t read it

This guy (a founding engineer of fly.io) isn’t claiming his 10x status in the article on the grounds that he uses AI

Indeed, he’s claiming that he gets value from AI despite being a 10xer without it

No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you’re just sloppily babbling talking points

Basically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all

What exactly is the argument?

1. Have you read the post?

2. If you’d like to refute the content on the grounds of another scientist, can you please provide a reference? I will read it

I don’t think this answers the question

Thank you for your considered and articulate comment

What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not

Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?

No it doesn’t