• 4 Posts
  • 181 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 3rd, 2026

help-circle







  • Productivity gains are substantial but vary by task complexity: GenAI accelerates OSS development in more ways than simply writing code faster. Respondents estimate average time reductions across all six OSS development activities measured, including proposal discussions (19%) and code authoring (52%). For high-complexity tasks, however, 21% of respondents report taking more time when using GenAI.

    You lose some you also win some though.

    Everything still goes through human review though regardless.

    It just shifts the time spent from writing code and other things to rewiting code and reviews most likely

    If they’ve never received a patch potentially from someone too, it’s going to be more likely to be bad code too that can be reviewed fairly quickly



  • The other way of helping with that, is give Apple, Adobe and Windows a huge advantage, so people can’t easily move to free / open software.

    It’s a lot more difficult to be controlled by a monopoly when the OS is free, and anyone can roll their own

    At the moment, money is basically going straight to closed source US companies for almost every desktop computer. Remember when Tim Cook gave Trump a gift publicly the other day? We KNOW Microsoft and Apple DEFINITELY aren’t on our side… They’re not even subtle about it anymore (weirdly though, it feels like Microsoft is more on our side these days than Apple)



  • Did you even read that 1 study you’re repeating, or just click the link

    If you read the study, they ran the tests over 13 mins only. And, they didn’t keep retesting to see if results changed over time either. If that ran the test over an hour, both results may have ended up at similar levels (we don’t know because it only tested over a short time)

    You need to learn to stop exaggerating or actually read crap instead of just the headline lol

    I know it’s the same study we both (or presumably just myself) read, because it was the only one. I wouldn’t call that “extremely well” anything









  • You understand it less it sounds like.

    1. Race Conditions are common. This isn’t new to AI. Nobody writes stories about them though unless they lead to security issues (like with XFS, which had one for 10 years and only fixed recently).
    2. There is a lot happening in the kernel, its not always a matter of looking in one tiny location. A race condition is pretty broad and can lead to many things.
    3. Patches get rejected all the time, for reasons including race conditions which are identified.
    4. If you check the post, other developers had tried and failed to fix the same issue. He’s not the only one. It was just yet another failed attempt
    5. Optimisation is HARD, and always has been.
    6. Finally, you say “suggested it for submission”. That code would go to a staging repo first for testing. He wasn’t suggesting pushing it immediately to the main tree…
    7. Standard development tools (at least for my development work) wouldn’t catch race conditions (maybe commercial ones / high end ones would)… AI is actually far better at detecting these things

    This isn’t a unique or interesting story in any capacity… It’s boring and normal