• 0 Posts
  • 88 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 3rd, 2023

help-circle







  • You overestimate LoZ’s popularity and underestimate Mario Kart’s. Not even those two particular entries, but in general. And I say that despite being a sucker for both the LoZ series and the less conventional BotW/TotK.

    BotW sold a lot for a Zelda game and even then it sold a lot less than Mario Kart 8 DX (despite it being a port of an older game).

    My take though? I got the bundle mostly because I expected better from MK World. It’s not a complete dud, but I would agree it’s rather underwhelming. MK8 is still my favourite and I would never consider it “a boring racing game” in any way.


  • It would be way more useful on NES (and Game Boy) because some idiot decided Switch B was NES B and Switch Y was… nothing at all.

    That’s not how thumbs work. You can’t have your thumb rest on both Switch B and A like you could on a NES (or GB) B and A, the orientation is wrong for that.

    On a SNES button pattern, you’ve got two diagonals, B-Y and A-X, with B-Y being the important default, natural one and A-X the alternative options for which you slide up with your thumb.

    At least A-X works on switch online NES, but B-Y should too. They’re the basic button pair everything else uses.



  • My favourite (inconsequential, but incredibly stupid) automatic AI question/answer from Google :

    I was looking for German playwright Brecht’s first name. The answer was Bertolt. It’s a pretty simple question, so that at least was correct.

    However, among the initial “frequently asked questions”, one was “What is the name of the Armored Titan?”

    Somehow Google decided it would randomly answer a question about manga/anime Attack on Titan in there. The only link between that question and my query is the answer, Bertolt (so of course, it wasn’t in my query). Because there’s a guy called Bertolt too in that story.

    By the way, Attack on Titan’s Bertolt is not the armoured titan.








  • I am speaking from experience.

    The latest example of that I encountered had a blatant logical inconsistency in its summary, a CVE that wasn’t relevant to what was discussed, because it was corrected years before the technology existed. Someone pointed at it.

    The poster hadn’t done the slightest to check what they posted, they just regurgitated it. It’s not the reader’s job to check the crap you’ve posted without the slightest effort.


  • Every now and then I see a guy barging in a topic bringing nothing else than “I asked [some AI service] and here’s what it said”, followed by 3 paragraphs of AI-gened gibberish. And then when it’s not well received they just don’t seem to understand.

    It’s baffling to me. Anyone can ask an AI. A lot of people specifically don’t, because they don’t want to battle with its output for an hour trying to sort out from where it got its information, whether it represented it well, or even whether it just hallucinated half of it.

    And those guys come posting a wall of text they may or may not have read themselves, and then they have the gall to go “What’s the problem, is any of that wrong?”… Dude, the problem is you have no fucking idea if it’s wrong yourself, have nothing to back it up, and have only brought automated noise to the conversation.