

What are you suggesting should have been done here?
Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!


What are you suggesting should have been done here?


To be fair, there are important differences between open source and closed source software.


I’m curious how it’s considered a “layoff” if it’s based on performance rather than the job itself being eliminated.


Reminds me of the old trick on HTML forms where you use CSS to make one of the form fields invisible to humans and reject any submission that filled in that field.


The problem is that an AI built to maximize paperclips might conclude that converting the planet to paperclips is an acceptable cost of maximizing paperclip production. It might understand why humans think it’s bad to convert the planet, but disagree. It would need to be explicitly programmed to prioritize human life over paperclips.
otherwise we would just switch it off
If it were super-intelligent, it could probably trick us into leaving it turned on.


A paperclip maximizer driven by self-preservation? What could possiblie go wrong?


Are there examples of censorship or prior restraint you’d like to highlight?


There is no such thing as an innocent billionaire.


Some have stopped working, like SteamLink, but others still work. I know it’s just a matter of time.


Mine can because it also has Netflix, Hulu, etc. built in.


Looks like compatibility hacks for various websites.
Interventions - are deeper modifications to make sites compatible. Firefox may modify certain code used on these sites to enforce compatibility. Each compatibility modification links to the bug on Bugzilla@Mozilla; click on the link to look up information about the underlying issue.
User Agent Override - change the user agent of Firefox when connections to certain sites are made.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Compatibility/UA_Override_&_Interventions_Testing


Ublock origin, Sponsor block, and NoScript


The value of the DNS is that we all use the same one. You can declare independence, but you’d lose out on that value.
AAAAAA(h)… now I get it.


I think we should have a rule that says if a LLM company invokes fair use on the training inputs then the outputs are public domain.


I just thought “pirate-friendly” was concise.


tl;dr: The users’ comments say that a certain ISP is pirate-friendly. Studios want to use the comments against the ISP (not the users).


That’s kind of the point.
Clementine originally forked from Amarok 1.4 because Amarok 2.0 changed too much.
Your neighbor’s open wifi.