I personally use Weawow currently, but I used Windy before.

The same reason they’re currently going after big corpo for bundling in random shit in OS. Microsoft recently had to remove or make removable a lot of their bloat on Windows. Google recently had to allow search engine selection at first install.

So antitrust legislation.

To further the point: in Chinese brands, this is a NOTORIOUS issue, because they do everything in their power to try stop the user from:

1. Uninstalling their bloat
2. Installing any of their competition’s products
3. Not having a shit ton of hidden trackers, which imo amounts to Spyware, even if you opt out of everything you can.

I know Chinese phone brands sell for low prices because they’re selling Spyware, that dualpurpose as phones.

And if everything was above board, I’d have no issue with that.

Want to fill your “phone” with ads so it pays your loss back in time? Go ahead.

Just let the user disable ALL of it if they so choose.

I’ll wait until EU declares Android phones must offer the option of stock AOSP, custom ROM, and OEM AOSP.

Until then, I’m staying the fuck away from Chinese phone brands.

Try Windscribe, they offer residential and datacenter IP’s. I don’t get the point, but it’s your money.

I erroneously said the IP’s are less shared, but that’s not the case per the page.

But still, they get past more ip-blocking.

https://windscribe.com/staticips

After reading where I’m even posting: Renting a cheap VPS and using Wireguard to tunnel to it is also an option.

Then it really is only used by you.

• Man, I’m really not reading today.

See: Anything that can open ports. NAT of any kind tends to not allow opening ports.

You can get Let’s Encrypt certificates for DuckDNS, so you don’t even need to own anything.

Works with anything that can open ports. DuckDNS works by pinging their service from anywhere to update the target IP for the subdomain.

You do realize all this is easily done with a reverse proxy + DuckDNS?

I can’t anymore. Leads to system crashing randomly. 11 works unfortunately.

Imo this is why big projects that are borderline like this should use github alternatives, preferably self hosted solutions. This was always going to happen.

Could you elaborate a bit?

Isn’t Proxmox etc. “Gpu less”, as they only use tty instead of anything like a WM or DE?

I’d prefer a “master” / hypervisor running a bunch of VM’s for different purposes.

Whether they be for gaming, pirating, development, pen testing, home automation, porn, or anything else really.

'Course I’d only be running gpu passthrough into a single VM at a time, can’t split a single GPU into 50 passthroughs yet.

iGPU shares one monitor with the dGPU, but on different protocol, which from what I read online is supported.

It only really needs output when I flick it open.

So maybe it needs a KVM switch instead of trusting the monitors splits.

How would hooking up everything to the GPU be beneficial when it comes to GPU passthrough?

Albeit is it even necessary these days.

You can disable it explicitly, yes.

It should be possible to use it with the dgpu.

Edit: You can also prioritize using the iGPU over the dGPU in bios. Maybe that’d work, hmm.

Sadly not sarcastic. Ideal is Radeon handling the base, and NVIDIA being used in passthrough.

They just refuse to cooperate.

Scenario 1. X11 “works”, wayland doesn’t. Trying to update NVIDIA drivers leads to boot failure.

Scenario 2. Wayland works. Only on igpu. Only via HDMI. Only on one monitor.

Scenario 3. Wayland works on Displayport. Doesn’t even recognize second monitor.

Scenario 4. Everything seems to work. Trying to do GPU passthrough fails.

Scenario 5. IGPU is hogging displayport, despite being connected via HDMI, thus preventing the DGPU passthrough on either HDMI or DP.

Reminds me more of a certain game that was on PS1 I think? This is just in 3D, that game was 2D.

Old plane bullet hells were nice, though. Albeit very hard.

I didn’t pay nuffin and I got 100% GUI for everything I use. Where did I go wrong??!

https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall

1. Content that you cannot acquire by any “lawful” means.
2. Content that you already own a copy of (Yes, this includes “only” having a “license” to it; you own what you own).
3. Content that is outrageously priced, and/or from large companies where the people who worked on the product will receive nothing from sold copies. (EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, etc)