

They only made those changes after several of the people whose likeness they stole called them out. Regardless, it should never have happened in the first place.
They only made those changes after several of the people whose likeness they stole called them out. Regardless, it should never have happened in the first place.
Tbh I could get behind either of those choices
You mean the browser that was caught injecting affiliate codes on cryptocurrency sites and misleading users into making donations that were collected by brave instead of the supposed recipient? That browser?
This line of thought is short sighted. Your senior engineers will eventually retire or leave the company. If everyone replaces junior engineers with ai, then there will be nobody with the experience to fill those empty seats. Then you end up with no junior engineers and no senior engineers, so who is wrangling the ai?
Do you have any actual evidence of this malicious code besides writing with your caps lock on? Frankly, this reads like some poorly-veiled astroturfing to sew distrust in what, as far as I can tell, is the most popular windows piracy tool.
I literally log in every day to play them, then log right back out.
Unfortunately paypal tends to shoot first and ask questions never, so it affects more than just bad actors. For example, my mom had her account frozen after someone scammed her on an ebay sale- they returned the item for money back but sent an empty box. When she reported it, paypal froze ALL of her funds and defended the scammer. Years later, she’s still out a couple hundred bucks.
They’re also notorious for randomly freezing funds and leaving users with no recourse.
Edit: typo
The only legitimate takedown I can see is is the non-commercial clause. If YouTube is making money off streams, wouldn’t that be a license violation?
Lol, so much for the instance’s only rule: “Be thoughtful, act responsibly, and treat others with respect.”
Removed by mod