

Great point here.
Great point here.
I guess herein lies the potential fallacy of my statement. Decreased desire is a Subjective observation.
One cannot draw a direct correlation, but there is data to conclude that not having a piracy option will boost sales of data initially, at least when it comes to games. (Hence why publishers continue to use Denuvo)
Disclosure: I have been sailing the seas for years, but…
This logic does no justice to the objective financial harm being done to the creators/owners of valuable data/content/media.
The original creator/owner is at a loss when data is copied. The intent of that data is to be copied for profit. Now that the data has been copied against the creator/owners will, they do not receive the profit from that copy.
Yes yes the argument is made that the pirate would not have bought the copy anyways, but having free copies of the content available on the internet decreases the desire for people to obtain paid copies of the data. At the very least it gives people an option not to pay for the data, which is not what the creator wanted in creating it. They are entitled to fair compensation to their work.
It is true that pirating is not directly theft, but it does definitely take away from the creator’s/distributor’s profit.
Not that this is what youre looking for, but Olauncher has done a great job of keeping me from being too distracted by my phone. All apps are in a text list, no colorful icons or red dots to grab your attention when they shouldnt.
Its surprisingly intuitive to use too.
It matters if you value it less as a collectible and more as a preserved, playable copy.
Yeah i guess it doesnt hurt
The one thing android users want apple to keep to themselves…
Yeahhh… If it has Denuvo like Frontiers i wouldnt consider that verified.
Not being playable/launchable offline contradicts the purpose of a mobile console.
Steam/valve really needs to consider the implications of the preservation-destroying DRM they allow in their games.
Games I have purchased on steam are no longer playable because of their online DRM that was abandoned.
I wont pay for a game with this form of DRM ever again.
So this is where minecraft having 2 pc versions (java and bedrock) gets complex.
It is very easy to find a custom or cracked launcher for java minecraft, and play it without also having to purchase minecraft on PC. You just have to source the game files for the version(i.e. 1.21) you want and play it with a cracked launcher.
When it comes to multiplayer… Java edition can operate its own server on Lan or the internet, and you can also setup a dedicated server on another machine that will let you and your friends play. This will work with purchased or cracked versions of mc java, assuming the game and server game version numbers match.
The whole reason Mojang/Microsoft made Bedrock was to allow them control over the community, and to make money. This means they charge for skins, resource packs and servers(now known as Realms). As far as i know, you cannot hose a Realm for free or with a crack.
There are programs that can convert bedrock saves to java saves, and vice versa… But the last time i used one it didnt work well.
The best option is to start a Java server, and use mods that allow bedrock players to join. That can be a pain too if they are on console.
This is why there is alot of disdain for the Bedrock version of mc…
Yeah but if 1500 is peak… The only thing that will save it longer term is going f2p.
That being said if you can hop on right now and get a couple games in, its likely worth the dollar.
Looked into it, looks like a great game for a killer price, but a tactical r6-like game is dependent on a team… Unless there is bot support this game is already dead in the water with its super low player count.
And i didnt see bot support listed anywhere. Lan support would be nice but getting 10 people to play lan with you on this game would be impossible.
Maybe the devs will get the hint eventually.
Oh sorry for misunderstanding. Its difficult to fathom watching scheduled programs anymore, but old habits do die hard. Best of luck to you.
With my android tv I put the main menu in “Apps Only” mode to cut down on the ads… There is still the main screen ad you cannot avoid but thats it.
Then i sideloaded SmartTube, which is youtube but it skips the ads for you.
I also have a Plex server i stream from.and update by torrenting shows to the server separately when theyre interesting enough. This takes more time and effort but is definitely worth it to have control over your media.
This is what no consumer protections on digital products looks like.
Its ok, we are just rolling over and taking it. Why own things when we could pay more to rent?