Never mind China and India — there’s much more cultural diversity in the world than you’d have us imagine even within any one “western” country.

It’s not much different from western cultures

Dude, maybe take a few steps away from the computer for a little while.

Bear in mind that the people coming up with this stuff are not completely stupid. Completely corrupt and ignorant perhaps, but not so inept that if they write legislation that strongly encourages practically everyone to use a VPN to avoid the bullshit it isn’t a good possibility that their aim (or the aim of those manipulating them) is to generate excuses to eventually make easy-to-use commercial VPN services illegal. Obviously many of us could get around such a ban with ease, but the more difficult they make it the fewer people will do it. There are reasons why not every kid on your average street is an I2P user. What they can’t effectively ban they’ll suppress by other means.

Further Left than even Obama himself!? Is that even possible?

Instead of zero as a comparison base, the report uses a pseudo count of one, concluding that the risk is 65 times higher

How delightfully nonsensical. I hope the authors were well-paid for their efforts.

Wow, someone even more devoted to blocking ads than I am. Personally I will just never go back to youtube rather than go through that much debugging.

The one time my combination of ublock origin, jshelter, noscript set to allow only the scripts that are actually needed, and custom firefox librewolf settings was insufficient to watch youtube I didn’t go back for a few days. When I did it was mysteriously back to working.

I wouldn’t be willing to disable my vpn for the nyt so thanks for confirming that it wouldn’t have made a difference. It appears that they now block everyone who doesn’t let javascript freely do whatever it wants to fingerprint you or whatever. I’ll not miss them too much.

Mastodon is very bad at fetching replies, if you have a small instance I think you need to add some other software to do that: https://blog.thms.uk/fedifetcher

Well that’s an interesting development, which people seem to have begun experimenting with in the past few weeks. Of course for the time being I suppose it’s made somewhat easier for the relays by 99% of the users being hosted on the small collection of official bsky.network PDS servers.

Some more discussion of it in which there may be hints as to how atproto people might slowly progress towards reinventing some of the things we take for granted on the fediverse.

If they don’t crawl the entire network then most of the network cannot contact them at all? Which makes it … not really a network. That’s where federation would come in.

Really? I thought there were only two. How are the small ones able to afford the bandwidth to monitor everything from every PDS?

Right… it did take me a minute to remember how the relays work. Well, when there are a few hundred of them we’ll see how it goes.

Hmm, let’s see if I remember the terminology correctly:

Client apps have nothing to do with it, obviously.

Alternate appviews have nothing to do with it, except in that they’d presumably need to work with whatever form of atproto federation exists, if any did.

Alternate relays aren’t federated unless there’s some protocol for routing messages between them — such as ActivityPub.

That’s the benefit of Bluesky being totally centralized, not built with any capability for federation: When they decide to add some, they can hardly fail to see that it’s best to go with ActivityPub.

Noscript user here; we don’t generally have that problem on fedia/mbin. It’s mostly just mastodon “quote posts” and imgur that don’t show up unless you allow their servers.

Sucks if you’re in France. For the rest of us it should be interesting to see which of these VPN providers choose to comply by geo-blocking France, which choose to cut any ties they have with France and otherwise ignore the order, and which to abandon their mission and become agents of censorship on behalf of France.

In that case, request a refund and just forget about the game. It’s that little bit worse for the publisher who chose Denuvo.

Well, I got around to reading it although I didn’t look too closely at the actual mathematics of quantum annealing. The sensationalist tone of the headline dominates much of the text as well, unfortunately. But they did factor a 2048 bit number, taken as representative of a class of such numbers which have two factors that differ from each other in only two of their bits. So a space of roughly 2^1000 numbers I guess.

California State University previously factored a 1061 bit number. It’s reference 27, which says “https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/44” where it should be “https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/444.pdf”.

This marks the first successful factorization of RSA-2048 by D-Wave quantum computer, regardless of employing mathematical or quantum techniques, despite dealing with special integers, exceeding 2^1061−1 of California State University.

That’s a lot of California State University. If I’m guessing correctly as to what they’re trying to say it’s an impressive result, but it is not a successful attack on RSA-2048 and it’s made somewhat less plausible by the misleading title.

It’s not as if I did an exhaustive search to sift through all the evidence, but what I found was this: https://lemm.ee/post/60365167