• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2026

help-circle










  • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.ml•Mint vs Ububtu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Flathub sandboxes applications to prevent them from infecting the system if app gets hacked, and lets you control permissions for each app, like microphone, camera etc.

    But they are still work in progress and easily circumvented, thus I called them only minor improvements.


  • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.ml•Mint vs Ububtu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only real issue with Ubuntu is it uses Snap app store instead of Flathub app store.

    Flathub has more apps, is faster, and has some minor security improvements. Linux Mint uses Flathub.

    HOWEVER, you can add Flathub as additional source in Ubuntu app store app, and use Flathub exclusively.

    In that case, no real difference between Ubuntu and Linux Mint other than UI.







  • There might be, but very few. Most (like gpt-oss, or Deepseek R1) are open weight, because no one wants to make their model training data public.

    Open sourcing a model would likely give away they are using pirated content or scrap internet websites without permission. That’s something Anthropic was fined for last year, they were caught using pirated books for model training.

    Moreover, training data is one of most lucrative resources in AI race next to GPUs, and AI companies are going all in on finding it, desperately fighting for any possible data. Heck recently they even started buying antique books, digitizing, and burning them.

    They invest a whole lot of resources to get quality data, and they don’t want to share it with competitors for free.

    My personal opinion though is FOSS philosophy doesn’t apply that cleanly to LLMs anyway. If compiling Chromium or Linux kernel from source is tedious enough, “compiling” an LLM from source on consumer hardware is straight impossible. It’s something only your competitors could do.

    Thus you can’t verify the LLM is the same as it’s source code anyway, so open source label becomes meaningless.

    And open weight model is still an improvement over using a cloud model, as it’s local and doesn’t call home with your chats data.