EU isn’t much better.

Guess China was just ahead of the curve.

Some trivial bounds: F(n-1) + 1 <= F(n) <= F(n-1) * 2 + 1.

Also F(n) <= 2^(n-1)

Randall forgot psychology, which has involved a ton of putting animals in boxes…

Pro life feminist is an oxymoron

So this is more like source available rather than open source…

Lol you really think a CEO, of a billion dollar company no less, being recognized on camera is “emblematic” of anything.

Don’t pretend they are like us.

Yes surveillance capitalism is ruining the society, but this is not it. Surprising bad take from 404media.

Maybe wine/proton is just better at Windowsing than Windows is.

Linus looks old now 😭

I guess that’s how time works but still…

Yeah they have the rights to do it, doesn’t mean it’s a good thing to do, doesn’t mean it won’t negatively impact the future of the project.

Redis had the rights to change the license of redis, look at where that led them.

I already use fediverse an unhealthy amount, if I do more I might die.

Curious: what are the wrong things it had prioritised?

I already said? It doesn’t affect FSR

This is bad reporting from phoronix (not surprising). The performance bug has nothing to do with FSR. It was just discovered in an FSR demo.

When Linus becomes entertaining is when he is not doing his job properly.

That’s why what Linus said was stupid when he brought WWII into this conversation…

Where should they move to? Countries that aren’t sanctioning Russia right now are likely to be… problematic? in other ways. But I am also pretty ignorant about which countries are on that list, and I would like to know more.

Maybe they need to become pirates on international water…

Not as much as living in Palestine or Ukraine.

If he did that that would have been genuine discrimination. If he has to do it now because of sanctions, then ok fine. But otherwise I don’t want to see an open source project treating people differently based on where they were born.

Come on lemmy, how is this pro-racism comment upvoted so many times? Please, think.

IANAL, but I think the general answer is no. When someone contribute code to an open source project, although they aren’t giving up their copyright, they do grant the recipient (and the rest of the world, for that matter) a license to use their code. In case of Linux, this is the GNU Public License. Unless GPL has a section about license revocation that I am not aware of, you won’t be able to take your code back.