Why put this much effort in trying to getting banned? Is making up a story based on the headline a creative writing exercise for you?
Why put this much effort in trying to getting banned? Is making up a story based on the headline a creative writing exercise for you?
They’re instituting this for the generation that grew up with Vpns so they could watch pirate streaming sites on their school Wi-Fi? Good fucking luck.
To be clear, you’re arguing that (considering the increase in population) desktop computer ownership per capita may be falling?
I think this is consistent with their content policy aims, so that’s fine. Meta will not easily ban Nazis, so I get where they’re coming from. I don’t think I personally would want to participate in this project if I was an admin though.
Damn small Linux. Not really “installed” of course, but was fun to play around with.
Outsourcing administration instead of doing it in house would be much cheaper for news orgs in the long run I’d think. Volunteer admins is one thing. Staff admins is another.
Eh, stuff like truth social doesn’t federate with anything anyway, so unfortunately this isn’t a vulnerability for them.
That’s less entitlement and more “trying to create the community they envision”, though. It’s entitlement if they feel like they deserve users after fucking around. Mods, or really any online community leaders, can do whatever the fuck they want as far as I’m concerned.
The walled garden social networks have a serious downside compared to fediverse networks and that’s the registration wall. If you’re primarily publishing press releases and announcements, people will be unable to effectively share through links what you’re publishing. Mastodon let’s you bypass that while still allowing for the engagement that the other platforms do. And you don’t have to play pay to win with the algorithm to get your stuff to actually show up on feeds of the people already fucking following you.
deleted by creator
The microbloggers are a bit different than us, in that they actually try to create a “social circle.” Threaded discussions with random assholes like we enjoy tend to be more focused on giving us someone to reply to.
deleted by creator
Don’t worry about it. If you were really wrong someone would chomp at the bit to reply to you about how wrong you are. If they’re not, you either have an unpopular or popular enough to be spam, opinion.
Actual banning but the federation making it weird is also a thing. Example would be us on Kbin. Folks can get banned from a community but if they’re on our instance they can still comment and it’ll still show up for us.
Yeah but which only fans pages should I follow as a Linux user
Opening a space for an OS fork led by a consortium of mobile phone manufacturers that don’t have a vested interest in supporting their ad and tracking business would be an overall benefit. Google sees value in android only for that, and that’s a major problem.
I don’t think they want to be. I just think they want to fragment Android. I agree with them.
Usually they’re integrated with server side purchases so an APK hack wouldn’t work with audiobooks. You’d have to use some sort of pirate client that I’m not aware of and may not exist. Good app idea though to pirate audiobooks from torrents to your phone. Kind of like popcorn time.
Just making shit up for ragebait is trolling my friend, it’s not having an opinion. What he posted has no relation to the interview.