• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • techt@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldNSFW on Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the ACAB post is just words, then no. If it’s imagery of people being beaten by cops, then yes. There’s no need to argue extremes to make the point seem ridiculous – just use judgment and be kind.

    It’s about being considerate; that’s where the conversation starts and ends, so don’t get sidetracked or focus on semantics. It does not matter why someone is browsing any website at their place of work, so let’s not even bring that into the conversation. NFSW is meant to help people view content at work/in public by making it avoidable. It’s a communication from the author/community to the audience that the content may or may not be inappropriate – that’s it. If it’s debatable and isn’t tagged, that’s inconsiderate and a request to tag it should be treated with consideration and kindness (barring trolls, which OP clearly isn’t).

    But that’s just my opinion, and I acknowledge yours is different.


  • techt@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldNSFW on Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just because there’s no nudity doesn’t mean it’s safe-for-work. This would absolutely make my female colleagues uncomfortable and that falls under the spirit of NSFW. Getting pedantic about what is or isn’t pornographic or nudity to justify having gross pictures up on your screen is entirely beside the point – if there’s any reason it could contribute to a less equitable workplace, it should be labeled NSFW. If there’s any debate about it at all, it’s the considerate thing to do.