

Would you buy one that is? (assume the specs that this thing has, also consider that your answer has to be valid when you eventually get it in 5 years or so)
Would you buy one that is? (assume the specs that this thing has, also consider that your answer has to be valid when you eventually get it in 5 years or so)
Does anyone know about a speedtest that’s like iperf but multicore and suited for >100GbE? I’ve seen Patrick from STH use something that could do like 400GbE but I haven’t found out what it’s called
I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense
What about “The ZipoApps of gTLDs”?
Looks like thunar (default file manager on xfce)
By that logic scratch would be the safest language out there (or can you tell me the last time a program written/built in scratch had a bug that affected millions of ppl around the world)
That cannot be true, i used #![forbid(unsafe_code)]
Jokes aside: yes, Rust (and Go) wont magically resolve SQL Injections, but if we remember that about 70% of bugs are related to memory safety, using Rust (or Go) will make your code at least somewhat safer
Yes, but there’s a difference between “you can write safe code” and “the compiler will come for your family the next time you make a mistake”
Do the python people really call themselves “Pythonistas”?
i feel like it’s okay that they do this, but i don’t like the term “source available”. maybe something like “Free for Non-Commercial Use” or “FOSS-NC”?
That guy was talking about grayjay, a Client to follow creators on multiple platforms at the same time. Grayjay isn’t licensed under AGPL, but instead it uses the FUTO Temporary License. It technically still counts as source available, but I think the NC-Part is okay to have. AGPL would be nicer though especially bc of this.
Germany has a fund like that, GNOME just recently got a grant of about 1M Euros to improve features and provide better accessibility
The only thing I can see in their License that would make it non-free is the non-commercial redistribution part of it, which is not that bad
Linux Defender for Torvalds365
That list is either the undo-menu or the layers themselves, as everything you do in GIMP is somewhat destructive. This behavior will be changed in GIMP 3 tho.
Wireless charging