rustyredox@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agoBluetooth 6.0 is HERE, how will your earbuds get BETTER? - YouTubeyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down16cross-posted to: android@lemdro.id
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkBluetooth 6.0 is HERE, how will your earbuds get BETTER? - YouTubeyoutube.comrustyredox@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: android@lemdro.id
minus-squaresolrize@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·13 days agoBluetooth SIX? How many more times til they get it right?
minus-squareneon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·13 days agoI rarely have had good experiences with Bluetooth. I do not even know which version of Bluetooth I have, but the version numbers are confusing enough that I don’t know which version has which features. Maybe that’s my fault, but when I see tech advertising the Bluetooth version and features, i just hope my device supports those features. Anyway, I’m done with my rant.
minus-squaresandwich.make(bathing_in_bismuth)@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·13 days agoI used to too, but that was in like 2009. Last 5 years or so it has been perfect for me
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·13 days agoBut innovation means number must go up. In this case more range and more low energy throughput
minus-squareStez@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoI’d say both of those things are pretty important and pretty cool
minus-squareZoteTheMighty@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·12 days agoThey’ll never get it right. Bluetooth is fundamentally bandwidth limited, new protocols can be a little more efficient, but that doesn’t change the fact that there’s just not enough data flowing for it to sound good.
minus-squareonslaught545@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·13 days agoI just want an option to not automatically connect to a known device.
Bluetooth SIX? How many more times til they get it right?
I rarely have had good experiences with Bluetooth.
I do not even know which version of Bluetooth I have, but the version numbers are confusing enough that I don’t know which version has which features.
Maybe that’s my fault, but when I see tech advertising the Bluetooth version and features, i just hope my device supports those features.
Anyway, I’m done with my rant.
I used to too, but that was in like 2009. Last 5 years or so it has been perfect for me
But innovation means number must go up. In this case more range and more low energy throughput
I’d say both of those things are pretty important and pretty cool
They’ll never get it right. Bluetooth is fundamentally bandwidth limited, new protocols can be a little more efficient, but that doesn’t change the fact that there’s just not enough data flowing for it to sound good.
I just want an option to not automatically connect to a known device.