I get the impression that shortwave is a relic of the pre-internet age. But I wonder what’s the least implausible scenario that would make the medium attractive again.

  • SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would think the proliferation of censorship at a digital level could push some people to it. Honestly, I’m brand new to the shortwave world and this is part of the reason I’m here.

  • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Least implausible is probably the collapse of civilization, but I could also see a Carrington event do it as well.

    Interestingly the question is more or less equivilent to the same things that would have people need to talk to each other again via voice.

    So I figure a prerequisite is it requires that the internet no longer be available, or that large enough groups of people can’t access it

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As one of the comments mentioned, I think it has a lot to do with how much you need one to many voice communication.

    With today’s world, data communication seems more necessary, and something like meshtastic, while currently quite limited in scope, might be something worth looking into.

    • AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Add to that the capability of Meshtastic to do basic encryption and a device entry fee of <$15. Limited scope doesnt matter as much if it’s widespread enough.

  • Poof [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    As far as I know radio transmissions cannot be tied to a single device like cell signals are. They can be listened in on easier. It’s also harder to shutdown those networks since it depends on individual devices and not a corporate controlled network. So it’s a niche use.