• frog@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    When there was only one land mass, is there any scientific theories if that would change the rotation of the earth on its axis or around the sun?

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No, but the climate was probably cooler and drier than today. In fact the interior regions of the supercontinent might have been too dry to support most life-forms.

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I was curious since mass would seem lopsided. I guess not enough. Thanks for answering.

        • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The crust of the earth is relatively thinner than the skin of an apple from my understanding. So I wouldn’t expect anything happening on the crust to have a huge impact on that kind of behavior. Granted, even small changes could be noticable.

          • frog@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That’s a great point. When it comes to the Earth’s mass, the surface is barely a factor.

        • deltapi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          My layman’s understanding is that the water mostly makes up for it, and that more wobble comes from the moon than any inconsistency in land-mass distribution