• tauonite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    They couldn’t. Domains and SSL certificates can be obtained very easily anonymously and thus wouldn’t let Google identify the developers of malicious apps, which is the goal of this

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      The trouble is Google’s definition of malicious apps. Are adblockers malicious? How about alternative apps for YouTube? Based on the recent history, I don’t think you will be able to install those apps on the phone you purchased.

      • tauonite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, I agree. Google will use this to control the Android app ecosystem beyond the Play Store and I don’t like it either

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It provides a way to open an investigation into a malicious developer without giving Google the ability to ban anyone it doesn’t like.

    • Squiddork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I mean some form of asymmetric encryption/validation would work but it stops the real reason why Google wants to implement this.