• yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      even within android, if you attempt to install an apk directly, it doesn’t say “would you like to sideload this application?”, but instead says, “Do you want to install this app?”.

      Even Google’s own OS doesn’t use made up language.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know what that’s supposed to prove. Use of the word is not mandatory.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Again, when I install something from the AUR (which is not where most software comes from —99+% are from official repositories) it isn’t given a special term. It’s the exact same situation as “sideloading” but we just call it installing. Can you explain what the difference is between them?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        —99+% are from official repositories

        LOL you just lumped every other repository into one and then excepted the AUR for…reasons?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Because the AUR is by users. The others aren’t.

          I know you just can’t explain the difference though so wrote this instead.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              Wow, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing? The term only exists for phones. The AUR is an unofficial user-run source and is equivalent to a source other than the play/apple store. If that term was actually useful or needed we call installing applications from the AUR sideloading, but we don’t. Clearly the term has no real utility besides making it sound like something you shouldn’t do.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Wow, you’re frustrating. If using an unofficial source for applications is called sideloading, why isn’t that term used for desktop computing?

                You are also frustrating, asking me questions that I’ve already answered: Because 99% of people aren’t using the default app store on desktops.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Yes they are! That’s what I’m saying. 99% of apps aren’t coming from the AUR. Why don’t we call it sideloading, if it were actually a term that were needed?

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    I don’t understand what you’re saying. The point is not that 99% of apps aren’t coming from anywhere, it’s that they are coming from somewhere…