• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t help but notice you declined to answer any of my questions.

    If you say “that person is jaywalking” you are framing the situation such that the car has more of a right to be there than the person.

    Incorrect. You are framing the situation such that the jaywalker is endangering themselves and other road users by ignoring the rules of the road that keep everyone safe. “Jaywalking” does not refer to pedestrians as a whole, only the people committing the act of jaywalking.

    Some places like the Netherlands have been undoing the damage, rectifying the error in urban design.

    Wonderful! Good for them!

    We are downtown because that was the context in which the term “jaywalking” was invented.

    Okay, so “jaywalking” only applies “downtown”. Presumably you can provide a source for this?

    The rest of us are talking about how “jaywalking” was coined to make a normal behavior (people walking around their city) seem wrong

    That is not what you’re talking about. You’re talking about automotive propaganda and the history of urban infrastructure. Nothing about the term itself or how it was misused or appropriated to mean something other than exactly what it does.

    That is why so many people are telling you to listen to what they’re saying.

    They keep saying things that I already know. Strawman topics that I agree with and don’t require further discussion.