• traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We as a society should be rethinking the term “security”, if it’s come to mean submitting to being jerked around however best suits some private company’s interests instead of our own. If there’s a central platform for its security benefit it should be democratically controlled instead of controlled by what are effectively feudal lords, or perhaps even an occupying force

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The security I am talking about has nothing to do with being locked down. Linux could easily implement the same, but it probably never will, because it requires a bit of central management and vision. And Linux really struggles with that.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You’re responding downthread of QubesOS being mentioned

        Sure it’s hard to get that kind of security onto mainstream distros. But it exists.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yeah, I was the one mentioning QubesOS. Since I tried it and didn’t last a week because of how bad the user experience was. I am not a CIA spy, I am looking for a balance of security and usability and android is amazing at that. Sure, some things could be more secure. Sure, I can’t do some things because GrapheneOS can’t be rooted. But the balance is excellent. At least for me.