• cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “I don’t want residents to think we’re giving a stamp of approval to Instagram and Facebook and Snapchat and all their oligarch owners,” said City Councilor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler at Monday’s meeting. “There’s no ethical social media companies under capitalism,” he said. “We can try to use the ones that are the least bad and reach the most Cambridge residents.”

    Somebody tell this guy about Mastodon.

    Also worth noting that this article is about the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts, not Cambridge, England nor the University of Cambridge. They still apparently thrive in the gutter.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      Judging by the quote, they’re likely going to bluesky. They will say that mastodon has a too restricted reach. It’s like a pattern. Every time I see someone coming with that “there’s no ethical [thing] under capitalism”, instead of promoting the anticapitalist things or the most ethical choices, they use the phrase to justify using another capitalist thing.

      • Specter@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Right.

        “We hate capitalist oligarchs which is why we are moving to another oligarch-owned platform.”

        It’s all so tiresome.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        Idk why they can’t use both, any big organisation has a social media team managing multiple handles

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Institutions don’t want to or simply don’t care. Anything else said is just an excuse to give a good-looking response

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I admitted to calling, I would be confirming that the phone number the guy’s office received a call from was linked to this Lemmy account.

          As it is, who knows who might have called? The call (or ideally, the calls, plural) could’ve come from any number of people who read that message.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I called too, he’s a public official and we are the public… nobody should be afraid of calling to provide feedback.

              It would be trivial for them to add another site, like Mastodon, to the software the keeps their socials in sync. They just need to hear about it and this guy doesn’t strike me as the ‘hanging out in the Fediverse’ type.

              If you want his office to know, you gotta tell them yourself. Don’t assume someone else will do it. You, yes you the person reading this from the other side of the 4th wall, remember the saying from Fortnite “Be the change you want to see in the world.”

              • Stormy@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                remember the saying from Fortnite “Be the change you want to see in the world.”

                That was Oprah