• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    this just completely defeats the purpose of an rpi.

    guess their acquisition was really spelling out their demise.

  • pluge@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I almost bought a RPi and realized I’d get better value at a Dell mini PC. Sure it’s significantly bigger than a Pi, but it’s still small enough for my use case. I just don’t see a good reason to get a Pi anymore. It used to be a cheap hobbyist board. Now it’s…something else.

  • FrederikNJS@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I realised a while ago that it’s way cheaper to hunt for second-hand intel NUCs, and the resulting machine is way more powerful… And the RAM and storage is upgradeable, if the NUC didn’t come with plenty of storage or RAM already…

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Low power draw but ridiculous power supply requirements of 5V5A (depending on the model) with a USB-C connector which isnt a thing outside of this specific application meaning they’re going to be expensive and hard to source. They should have just done a barrel plug or put an effing voltage regulator on board like Arduinos.

          • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The 5V5A supply is optional, the Pi 5 alone works perfectly fine using a standard 5V3A USB-PD supply, it just limits the maximum combined USB port current to 600mA.
            But technically they are still in USB-PD spec: it’s apparently okay for a charger to support 5V5A, and a device to “prefer” to use that if it’s available. It can’t be required, but as said, the Pi 5 works with 5V3A, so it isn’t.

            It’s still dumb, and they should have just used 9V3A instead and paid the dollar for the stepdown circuitry like everyone else.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It really needs USB-PD support with an onboard regulator, but of course that would be way too crazy to implement.

            Pi’s were cool up until the 3b and everything after has just not been good for the form factor. Conveniently, the 3B was about the time they started prioritizing selling volume to commercial customers.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Low power draw but ridiculous power supply requirements of 5V5A (depending on the model) with a USB-C connector which isnt a thing outside of this specific application meaning they’re going to be expensive and hard to source.

            That’s only for the Pi 5 (the highest end unit), and I’ll agree that at that level its hard to justify a Pi over a larger computer. Even for the Pi 5 its not that hard to find those Power Supplies. Most laptops today use power supplies that meet or exceed those specs. You’re right that those are more expensive than Pi 4 and below Power Supplies.

            They should have just done a barrel plug or put an effing voltage regulator on board like Arduinos.

            Again, no defense of Pi 5 from me. However, for everything below Pi 5, HARD PASS on a voltage regulator. I don’t want that heat in the tiny Pi case. At the lower power requirements of Pi4 and below USB power is fine.

            • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Most laptops today use power supplies that meet or exceed those specs.

              Non those are USB-PD power supplies that increase voltage up to 20V in order to deliver more power. No USB standard that I’m aware of offers 5A at 5V.

              As far as heat goes, these devices already need heatsinks and case fans, so the difference seems negligible.

              Also, good luck using a Pi5 any further than 3ft from a wall outlet unless you want to rig up your own power supply using some 14/2 Romex with a USB C connector soldered to the end.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                As far as heat goes, these devices already need heatsinks and case fans, so the difference seems negligible.

                Pi 4 and below don’t require active cooling. I want to keep it that way.

                Also, good luck using a Pi5

                Again, I offer no defense of Pi5. I don’t use it and don’t recommend it.

                • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I’m not sure why you’re referring to the Pi4 since it doesn’t require this entirely non-standard power supply and isn’t their current flagship model. Nobody is asking for old models to be retrofitted with voltage regulators so that they don’t have to use a power supply that they already don’t need to use.

                  You say you don’t use or recommend the Pi5 and yet you’re seemingly arguing that its power supply requirements aren’t a big deal and that improvements should absolutely not be made to it.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          My thinkcentre draws power but not that much power. Also, just combine it with an ESP and you get the best of two worlds.

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think the ecosystem has some more benefits besides that. Ready to use case, cooler, camera, display options and lots of resources for putting these things together compared to NUCs/minipcs. I do like how the compute modules are even more flexible with the ability to choose from various carrier boards. Really depends on your use case which makes the most sense.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        and you can replicate that nowadays with an RP2040. Hell, the newer Pi models already kinda do that with the RP1 handling GPIO (among other things)

  • redditmademedoit@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would have been in the market for one, but they were already a terrible value proposition.

    Meanwhile, Mac Mini prices have held stable at an already good price/performance ratio…

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      From my understanding Apple has memory contracts locked in for years ahead. This is a benefit they have for being an enormous player in the consumer electronics world. They can keep their memory prices “low” (or at least what Apple normally considers low) because of that.

      Other smaller manufacturers don’t have that luxury. When their current contracts run out they have to negotiate new ones, and they will be negotiated at the current market rate.