This is why the argument that paying for something would prevent ads falls apart. If they can squeeze more money out of people then they will, even if those people are paying $80k+ for the damn thing.

How is AI not buried under piles of lawsuits?

Funny thing to say after using their code to train the shitty-ass AI. Developers don’t need AI, but AI certainly needs developers.

They play the victim regardless.

Econ 101 also states that a failed business stops existing. In reality, failed businesses are endlessly bailed out as “too big to fail” and they pay their executives bonuses with that bailout money while continuing to rip off customers along with the other one or two companies in the same industry that do the same.

Use it for what? Generating a bunch of nonsense text that others have to waste time reading? Generating shitty images with fucked up hands and garbled text to use in stupid ads for worthless trash?

This is a “competitive advantage” not worth pursuing. Most AI products/services lose money and even if they didn’t, they’re creatively bankrupt as a whole and shouldn’t be admired for squeezing money with lower quality.

“Learn to code” didn’t solve the deep underlying issues with the job market?

Looking forward to Tesla reporting Q2 earnings next month. I assume another round of disastrous numbers paired up with some vaporware distraction. Perhaps they can keep this charade going, but at some point reality will catch up.

It already jumped up about 10% on monday simply because the service launched. Even if the service crashes and burns, they’ll jump to the next hype topic like robots or AI or whatever and the stock price will stay up.

Oh right, I forgot that history started on October 7th.

Iran is simply countering the terrorist state known as israel.

Iran has the right to defend themselves and israel has proven again that Iran is in need of this defense.

I wasn’t on reddit, but I did hear a lot of buzz about lemmy around that time, so I decided to check it out. It’s been one of the better places I’ve enjoyed for discussion.

Except back then there were a lot fewer customers, cartridges cost a lot more to manufacture, and there wasn’t countless DLC to make even more money. Also, now there are so many games that the raw supply is practically infinite.

Awesome! Now all I need to do is to stop being lazy and actually make a new game. Challenge level: impossible.

After all these years, the new hardware had better be far higher spec than just moderately so.

This is a Switch too.

Who is the OAuth provider in this case? The instance you sign up on? That’s already the case.

I’m glad Nintendo is finally starting to realize the potential of playable Zelda. Her style of gameplay will put a fresh new spin on the series. I also hope to see somewhere down the line a game where you can choose to play as either Zelda or Link and your choice will give you a different experience and cause puzzles to have different solutions, which would be good for a replay. Such a game would also have the potential for two-player co-op with vastly different abilities.

That’s true to some extent. I don’t agree with hard censorship like that, but there is also the risk of getting astroturfed and brigaded like reddit, which had a clear example as far back as 2013 where Eglin Air Force Base, FL showed up as “most addicted city”. The goal of censorship is to give your own opinions more space, so I’m not exactly upset if other instances are moderated in a different way when there are plenty of other instances moderated in a different way. The fediverse offers plenty of space.