

Well, yes, but how is all that differs from Reddit? I see Lemmy as an exact copy of Reddit, but with more accessible API and fewer moderators. And fewer people, of course, too. Oh, and lags. All servers, except for some big ones, lag.


Well, yes, but how is all that differs from Reddit? I see Lemmy as an exact copy of Reddit, but with more accessible API and fewer moderators. And fewer people, of course, too. Oh, and lags. All servers, except for some big ones, lag.


The oldest rule of this restaurant: do not discuss whatever the owner dislikes.
Next rule: respect the house rules.
Also a rather old rule: we will send you out for disrespecting the house rules.
New rule: no boiled carrots in any dish!


Under… what? Those “places” crossed fascism line a decade ago. Marasmus line a few years ago. What additional regulation do you want? VIN number of the user’s ass?


And why is that happened?


Cherry tree and knife.


That’s easy: start like a shed and add machinery after finishing the roof.


In 10 years: the amount of sports fans is declining. Why? What to do?!


Blame AI! Who else?


No, why would we? Americans maybe? They love ads, apparently…


Copyrasts kick each other. I hope both sides will be harmed. A lot. Alas the customers will pay for any damage anyway, but at least it will be some show.


No? Cook’s moving isn’t a “technology” story.


Dictators too. That doesn’t make news about them “technology” news.


Nah, ceo-shmeo shuffle has nothing to do with technology.


YoU WiLl hAvE +0 ChILdReN tHiS wAy!


Even on my personal level I started to use Wikipedia much less. The reason is peculiar though: too much data while too little data. What does that even mean? Wikipedia articles don’t have complete data that is enough for practical use, so I still need to look for information in more specialized sources. And in the cases when I just want a 1-sentence answer on what-the-fuck-this-thing-is question, Wikipedia gives me a few pages of data I don’t need or want. In both cases I am left dissatisfied. So I use Wiki less and less.


Chatbot is bad and Floridaman is a victim, huh?


The definition of fascism is trivial: only one ideology is permitted (no matter what that ideology is exactly), anything else is forbidden.
So any forced limitations without objectively obvious/proven reasons that are welcome by community is fascism. As simple as that.
Limitations of theft and killings are not fascism because most people are against those activities. Limitations on education access is fascism because most people welcome education.
Those who have different opinions can impose their own private limitations in the non-fascist community. Like age restrictions for this or that activity.


Some of them are.


Your point of view: We have so many fascists in reality, why couldn’t we tolerate some fascism on the internet?
My reason: because you have provided no text to concentrate on. Just a link to some site where I expected to crawl through tons of menus, cookies reminders, photos of diverse people happily smiling and pop-up windows asking for subscription.
So I ignore it altogether.