Paul McCartney’s official Reddit account seems to have been banned. The account, u/paulmccartney, had just dropped a set of photos and videos from the first night of his shows at the Fonda Theatre. It went straight into the r/PaulMcCartney subreddit. Then, not long after, the whole thing disappeared.

  • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    reddit says he wasn’t banned but temporarily restricted during a password reset requirement, which showed him as banned due to a reddit bug

    • gokayburuc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Because there are still a lot of content creators, especially in the technology field.If the process of sharing code and projects and receiving feedback took place on another platform, nobody would use Reddit.That’s my only reason.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The other night I was watching John Stewart and he made an interesting comment. He said that reddit only recently became usable because it was too gross before. Insane especially from him

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      whoever has the most users has most of the users. until they decide they don’t have any users, they will continue to have this true statement be correct constantly

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Reddit has a lot of established local community subreddits, and when you are that established, its hard to give up.

      Disclaimer: I was just banned on a second account after being found out for my first ban (I said some things with, well, lets say “high praxis”) and I am not happy about it.

      • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I was banned for prohibited content on my “other accounts.”

        I only have one account. (Appeal was denied, and I suspect the entire operation was done by bots. It literally said, “go look at your other accounts to see what you did wrong.”)

        Meanwhile, another user over there is advocating violence against a very well known public figure (I’m sure you can guess what and who), and the comment is still up and the poster is not banned. -throws up hands-

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          yea its definitely bot/AI moderation on reddit, reddit wont scale back this, due to them having less work to appeal to all those bans.

          All also you know the ban is done by a AI/bot is if gives a generic message like “your other accounts violated,this or that” instead of the ban telling which community you got banned in.

          reddit doesnt go after propaganda bots, as far as ive observed they target only the ones they cant benefit from(OF accounts, people who connect thier posts thier business".

          and right wing propaganda is quite lucrative right now.

      • JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, I’ve been getting very bad vibes from that place for a while now. It seems very filtered and the content is no longer reflective of what people upvote. It’s tracking more to corporate interests and propaganda. Also, I think a lot of people have unintentionally divulged their most private information and don’t even know it. Their innermost thought expressed in comments, likes dislikes cataloged in votes, all under the false sense of an anonymity. It would be very easy, especially now with AI, to link IPs, browser thumbprints, and writing style analysis back to individual people, at a mass scale. I think a reckoning is coming.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s funny how a lot of the complaints I’m reading here are about how Reddit is unfriendly toward left-leaning people but all the right wing people complain about how Reddit is a cesspool of liberal propaganda.

    It just goes to show that the platform plays both sides just to promote hate and anger.

    I visited after I got banned and the default posts that show up without logging in (therefore uncurated) were all so irritating that I had to assume they were all ragebait.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      yea just like other social media platforms, they allow astroturfing thats why its both sides getting triggered.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s because the platform is full of people who can’t handle someone not agreeing with them, so anyone who says they’re wrong is immediately labelled as the enemy.

      • Napster153@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Worse, they allow these same people into power while the real owners of the site make money out of the inhumanoids overrunning the whole system.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reddit is hostile towards left-leaning people, and it is also a cesspool of liberal propaganda. Liberals fucking hate leftists, even more than they hate fascists, because liberalism is fundamentally pro-capitalism. That’s why the mainstream media is currently crashing out about people like Hasan Piker, who actually represent a growing base of support for socialism, and they run every possible smear they can.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ok, whatever. The point was that they have fun seeing us bicker over shit for their profit.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes they are. Liberal covers a wide range of ideology. The liberal versus leftists debate is a Russian pysop

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The American use of political terms like liberal and socialist are warped from their original meanings.

          Both can mean supporting healthcare for everyone for example. Even though that’s neither a policy following from the theory of liberalism, nor is socialized healthcare dependent on following socialism.

          The same is true for progressivism and leftists. All of these terms are often used interchangeably to the previous two.

          There’s a deep lack of nuance and specificity.

          Actual Marxist leftists and democratic liberals are ideologically opposed to another in many ways. In the US they might agree on better healthcare for everyone and waving rainbow flags. Liberals should be for free markets, (regulated) capitalism, freedoms, etc. A leftist should be opposed to all of these. Freedom to a Marxist means something else than to a liberal.

          Nowadays a lot of political discourse across the spectrum is deeply rooted in identity, creating division, virtue signaling, moralist preaching, etc.

          Discussion on specific politics and details is often cut short by the above campism and clinging to identities.

          This applies to the right and the left equally.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        “Wing” is not the term to use. Liberals sat on the left side of parliament, literally the left wing of a hall, so it’s accurate and quite literal to call them “left wing”. What isn’t accurate is calling them leftist, as in socialist, and I think that’s the term everyone is actually talking about? Everyone is talking past each other here cause of the wing thing.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Well… The “wing” of a parliament very roughly represents a political compass. Liberals aren’t left-wing anymore by virtue of having more politically left parties that occupy those physical seats today.

          It does create a very funny situation like here in Denmark where “Venstre” (literally The Danish word for “Left”) is a right-wing political party. More right-wing than “Liberale Alliance” (Danish Liberal Party).

          But Venstre used to be the left-wing party when it formed. Since then, green parties, socialist parties, communist parties, and various parties adjacent to those ideologies, have formed to occupy the left side of the parliament seats, pushing Venstre’s physical seating position all the way to the right side.

          With liberals and moderates being more politically left than them, Venstre now sits right next to the most conservative parties of Denmark. They’re still keeping the name, though.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          More like the European reality.

          Compared to Europe, America doesn’t have a left wing. Just a right wing and an extreme right wing.

            • Tattorack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Which translates to:

              • Lower taxes.
              • Less welfare.
              • Defunding public services in favour of private services.
              • Less regulation/“smaller government”.
              • More laws protecting acquisition and ownership.

              In other words, all the basic right-wing talking points minus nationalism,religion, and “country first”.

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Liberalism is fundamentally a right wing ideology, it’s primarily concerned about the freedom of markets, rather than the freedoms of people, and when it comes down to choosing between the rights of individuals and the interests of corporations, liberals will side with business interests, nearly every single time. Usually, they’ll always couch it in more progressive terms, like talking about jobs and economic growth. That’s why both mainstream Democrats and mainstream Republicans agree on most issues, because they’re both pro-business, pro-capitalist institutions.

          • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            So you can’t be pro human liberty anymore? That’s what being a liberal is to me. Corporations are not our friends and hate them as much as a leftist. In my mind, my and my peoples liberty trumps your idea of a perfect economic system. Whatever happens along the way to socialism or back to capitalism, human rights must come first. I don’t know why that concept is so hard for leftists to grasp. I think leftists are affected by a similar psyop that affects Republicans in this regard

            • bearboiblake@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Of course you can, but when people identify themselves or others as “liberal”, they’re not referring to individual liberty, they’re usually referring to “liberalism”, which does contain some elements of individual liberties, but far more importance is given to free market economics and free flow of capital, than it is to individual freedoms. That’s why corporations can invest anywhere and borders don’t pose much issue for them, whereas it is very hard and expensive for individuals to move to another country.

              • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                You’re talking about lasseiz fair liberalism. Billionaires and corps are not in any way shape or form “liberal” these days unless you want to talk about neoliberals who pretend to be altruistic. It’s all a psyop to divide the proletariat

                • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  No, I’m just talking about liberalism. You probably have some high-minded enlightenment-era ideals floating around in your head about what liberalism is, but I’m telling you, your ideas about how liberalism is about freedom, that’s the actual psyop to divide the proletariat you spoke of. Liberalism is functionally one big propaganda operation to replace monarchies with oligarchies.

            • Tattorack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. Moreover, you seem to be lumping a bunch of things together.

              Are you American? I could blame that on the lack of a proper representative democracy. Everything gets shovelled together into either one camp or the other, even when they don’t have anything related to each other.

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I know a great deal about what I’m talking about, but if you feel that I’m wrong about something in particular, I’d be happy to discuss it. I am not American.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lmao I feel the same. Literally feels like rage bait. Like these people are so freaking ignorant. It doesn’t help a lot of Reddit posts are just bots recirculating old content.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    211
    ·
    2 days ago

    So, in conclusion, Reddit banned McCartney for posting images from his own concert in his own subreddit? Wild…

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My three notable bans:

    1. Banned from politics for quoting the Constitution on treason punishment
    2. Banned from gym for arguing with a “pro” claiming there are no stupid exercises and bad form doesn’t exist.
    3. Banned from child free for saying not every one that is child free hates children with the passion of a burning sun and wants them all to die.

    Edit: I forgot to mention when time number 2 happened. I asked the mod “Why was I banned?” Then my entire account got a 3 month suspension for “Mod abuse” by the admins.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      ooh the gym sub is quite awful, they act as if people losing their weight and getting jacked suddenly is not due to steroids and act as long “arduous battle” they do ban for mentioning PEDs too, bitch you people cheated your way to that body aka shortcut, instead of taking months-years to get that body. one post i came across, the guy was very overweight and suddenly hes lean and all buff from roids/peds and act as if he got that all on his own journey, i think it took less than a year for that. i can see 20 somethings getting a body similar to that if they already thin and workout all the time. but a 300+lb going to a muscular body in that time.

    • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think my worst one was being banned from the united kingdom sub for suggesting an immigrant who stabbed a random child in the face should be deported to the middle of the ocean. Had a few hundreds up votes when they banned me so I’d say most people agreed.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        i got banned from EUROPE, and ukraine report for some wierd reason, how thier current situation of a post is due to US INFLUENCE. they dont like the fact that russia/us is influencing thier problems.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Heh, I was also banned for the same reason as you - quoting the exact text of the constitution to say what should happen to insurrectionists. My appeal was denied in seconds.

      The time before that it was during the presidential debate live watch threads, and there was a portion of the broadcast where the camera dipped away from the speaker, so I wrote “kill the cameraman!”, an obviously non-serious statement in reference to the subreddit /r/killthecameraman, and got banned for that. That was only a three week suspension I think. The mod who banned me also handled my appeal as well, promptly ignored.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      When Epstein was sent to prison and was in protective custody, I suggested that he shouldn’t have special treatment and belonged in genpop.

      Banned for advocating violence against someone.

      May that mod have a spasm and faceplant hard on a gravel road, then be forced to drink cold hot-dog water while listening to Baby Shark at high volume on an endless loop. And may all their teeth fall out but one, and in that, may they have a toothache.

      • knotRyder@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got banned for suggesting someone should drill a hole in the Charlie kirk statue

      • sleepyplacebo@rblind.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s interesting you mention the Baby Shark thing. In Oklahoma there were some prison guards who forced multiple people at various times to stand handcuffed in a stress position for hours listening to Baby Shark for the purpose of torturing them. There was also other forms of physical abuse that happened.

        The guards were arrested but were given 2 years of probation. But you as an average citizen get caught up in some war on drugs bullshit where you didn’t even victimize anyone and your unlikely to get the same treatment in many cases, especially in some harsher states.

        Former Oklahoma jail officers sued over ‘Baby Shark’ torture tactic are placed on probation

        Christian Charles Miles and Gregory Cornell Butler Jr. pleaded no contest to misdemeanor cruelty to a prisoner

        A federal civil rights lawsuit four inmates filed in 2021 accused Miles and Butler of using excessive force and discipline tactics described as “torture events.”

        Joseph Mitchell, said he was pulled from his cell in November 2019 and placed in a room where he was forced into a “standing stress position” for three to four hours while he was handcuffed behind his back, according to the lawsuit. Officers then played “Baby Shark” on repeat so loud “that it was reverberating down the hallways,” it said.

        Ja’Lee Foreman Jr., another inmate, said in the suit that he was not forced to listen to the song but was placed in a stress position and then kneed in the back and slammed into a wall by Miles. Foreman alleged that Miles spat on him as Butler laughed.

        In addition to probation, Miles and Butler must complete 40 hours of community service, and they were fined $200 and ordered to pay $300 in victims’ compensation. They are also no longer allowed to work in law enforcement, the court records state.

        Butler’s attorney, Lance Phillips, said his client is “happy this matter is behind him.” If Butler remains out of trouble while on probation, he will not have a misdemeanor conviction on his record, Phillips said Wednesday.

      • 13igTyme@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        He was saying there’s no such thing as bad form for an exercise. I was posting video clips of people with bad form getting hurt as examples. He would then make up some stuff about it wasn’t the form that caused them to get hurt.

    • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am permanently banned, for using the term “kick rocks and pound sand,” which is just American for “there’s nothing you can do.” An excuse to get one more leftist off the platform.

      • AngryDeuce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got permanently banned for insinuating Donald Trump was a pedophile. I appealed and they blew me off, no response. Tried to sign up for another account and got immediately IP banned for ban evasion.

        Id been on the platform for 14 years and had over 1M comment karma. Somehow the last 14 years of my contributions to the site never caused anything, not even so much as a subreddit ban, but pointing out that Donald Trump is a sexual predator was a bridge too far for them.

        I find it curious that Reddit Admins are trying to limit discussion of the factual statement that our current president is a documented child rapist. Guess the investors theyre courting are probably in the files, or at the very least, dont see nothin wrong with a little pedorasty.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          reddit detects ban evasion quite eaisly now. unless you use a different device and IP address you will get banned on any new accounts. when before you can just lay low on a new account.

        • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Reddit is quietly pivoting to become a Conservative platform, with lots and lots of monetization.

          • AngryDeuce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I knew that the people running the show were scumbags, but i guess I never knew they were MAGA scumbags.

            I should have made the switch after their API horseshit, but I guess a lesson learned late is better than not learning the lesson at all.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Spez is also into whatever ideology is popular among the tech rich of Silicon Valley at any given time. Right now that’s technofascism

    • Doom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My favorite will always be being banned from AITAH for being too mean?/honest?/using a curse word? I’m not sure they just said my language was inappropriate. I may have used the word asshole.

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      An old account got banned on multiple completely unrelated subreddits because I was having a discussion with someone that self identified as a “responsible pitbull owner” and I asked them as part of the pitbull community to talk to irresponsible pitbull owners and make them responsible instead of defending them. Turns out the “responsible pitbull owner” was one of those mod hoarders on their alt account and went full pitbull when somebody dared to disagree with them. I filed a complaint to admins for mod abuse and obviously nothing happened.

      And my current account has had multiple temporary bans for making fun of nazis. I mean, sure, I can take a temp ban for “inciting violence” when I remind the kids that every day is punch a nazi day. But these fragile little snowflakes can’t even take some basic banter and the mods fold immediately when the nazis start weeping. It’s funny and sad, isn’t it.

    • Ttangko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I still havent gotten a response from the site owners why I got completely removed (ip-ban)

      Last thing was me arguing with a mod about the reason I got sub banned: me simply commenting “source:[tabloid’s name]” under a news post that was baiting incitement. they claimed I was derailing when the whole post was literally just the blog post of that bad faith tabloid in a rather “serious” sub /de XD

      its a joke of a platform that carefully fosters a gullible army of bootlickers it seems, at least to me being left on read like that

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just got my first ever warning the other day.

      Was a comment about voting on using gallows or guillotines to solve some problems in the US.

      Wasn’t even advocating it, just offering it as a suggestion to those living there.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got banned from a bunch of Reddit subs for once telling someone they were wrong about the Yorkshire accent in the UK. They called me a liar about being British and then I got banned from like 30 places at once.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      2 days ago

      I got a “permanent suspension” from all of Reddit. Isn’t a suspension temporary, wouldn’t a permanent suspension just be a ban?

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe it’s the difference between undoable or not undoable.

        If you think about it, when a judge gives you a “suspended sentence” for a crime, it is permanently suspended meaning there is no set expiry. But it can be made to expire if needed.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That tracks. You pissed off someone who had a connection with a mod and/or admin. Been there!

      I got banned once for dunking on IG travel trends and the mod involved was dumb enough to PM me threatening me.

      It’s just pathetic how emotional and over reactive people saying crap on the internet they don’t like. I don’t agree with a lot of stuff but I see no reason to censor people for enjoying musicals or whatever else I hate.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        I once got banned in a bunch of subs, including some I wasn’t even in, because a mod didn’t like a comment I made in a sub that wasn’t even theirs. They just didn’t like it, so they banned me in all the subs they modded. Fucking weirdos.

      • Skv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Considering all mods are probably mirrors of antiwork mod the entire world got to see - zero surprises there.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You see, I never had a single comment moderated by the anti-work people, and I made a lot, a lot of them very extreme comments. Like illegally so. But many other subs I have had that same problem. I used to use revveddit to see which Subs were secretly silencing me, which included pics, and so many others. Mostly Auto mod bullshit I presume. Auto mod which I trust is corrupted by the government for Israel and a number of other issues.

          • Skv@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Referring more to physical looks and lifestyle of the head mod there.

        • egrets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I think it’s the direct mention of the user that the c/technology mods didn’t like, which I can understand. You might be better off removing it from your comment.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Plenty of .ml related moderators on other groups as well that will ban users on lemmy as well because of .ml bs.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes that happens, for some reason that user actively goes to FuckAI and bans people who posted there. I can only assume that they see disdain for AI as a personal slight.

      • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        66
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah so the AI haters have doxxed them, posted their photos on Lemmy, and harassed them non stop.

        But you got banned, that’s rough buddy.

          • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            64
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s pretty straightforward, they’ve been targeted and doxxed and harassed by anti ai trolls on Lemmy. You probably downvoted some posts in their comms, contributing to this and got banned.

            If it’s a comm that doesn’t interest you, why are you even going on about it a month later to shit talk the user?

            • egrets@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              49
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              why are you even going on about it a month later to shit talk the user?

              Why did I mention something relevant to the conversation? That’s your question?

              • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                46
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                You could have easily done so without directly linking them. That adds nothing except pushing your vendetta and directing more harassment at them.

                • egrets@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  49
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t have a vendetta. I’m entirely ignorant of the context you’re describing. I got blanket banned from a series of communities by aforementioned user for (presumably) downvoting. I’m not really very interested in continuing this.

          • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The posts have been deleted, you can go ask on dbzer0, the mods should be able to verify it happened.

    • Tim@lemmy.snowgoons.ro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I got a sitewide warning a couple of months ago for suggesting that Trump’s inaugural “board of peace” meeting was the apotheosis of the “you have one bullet…” thought experiment. “After reviewing, we found that you broke Rule 1 because you threatened violence or physical harm.” I’ll wager Trump’s secret service guys were absolutely shitting themselves when they read it, so it’s probably for the best they took it down tbf.

      On the bright side, it was the kick up the backside that was needed to get me to try Lemmy, and I hardly use Reddit at all now.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I replaced every one of my comments and posts with lorem ipsum before I terminated my accounts.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I got banned from one of the UK subreddits when someone posted a lengthy comment about why Brexit was amazing, and I responded that Brexit was idiotic. I got banned for “being political” and the person I was responding to didn’t lol.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds like you were a dick and didn’t realize and doubled down. No way to tell now.

      • Darkard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 days ago

        What a bold and insulting statement to make with absolutely no information to back it up.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          2 days ago

          Based on how you tell the story.

          It’s a reasonable scenario for the result and your interpretation of it.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got banned from about 15 subreddits I never even knew existed once by calling out a transphobic dogwhistle, and when I inquired about the bans, the mods insinuated I was a child molester and neo-nazi.

        Reddit mods don’t need to follow any sort of logic.

        And confidently asserting someone is a dick because they got banned from a subreddit is hilarious, and should probably prompt some self-reflection.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          There sure are cases of injust behavior by power tripping mods. That being said just presuming guilt and malice is unfair to the volunteers taking care of reddit today.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The appropriate way to take care of Reddit is to shut it down, sell all its assets and donate the proceeds to blind dogs, imprison every paid member of staff, put their families into foster homes (if any of them aren’t incels), bulldoze their dwellings, salt their fields, and systematically delete anything online that they ever uploaded.

            Then dunk the shareholders’ heads one by one in a bucket of horse piss, duration of dunking in proportion to the number of shares held.

            I know it’s milder than they deserve, but you gotta start somewhere.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You could have just not typed anything and everything and everyone would have been better off for it.

      • pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I once got banned from some weird parenting subreddit I’d never visited because I said cheeseburgers aren’t kosher, some mods are just freaking weird (or bots.)

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just want to say that I know people who have known Paul for many years, and every single one of them have nothing but good things to say about him. He knows people want to catch him doing jerk behavior, so he bends over backwards to be polite and respectful to EVERYBODY. He’s a Righteous Dude.

    • Xechon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately my first association is the “Glass Walls” ad that was hammered into my brain hundreds of times before I learned to block them.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTifP6idBPs

      No, Paul, do you think slaughterhouse employees are even more likely to be vegetarian? Good intentions, but so infuriating.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m a carnivore, but I respect reasonable vegetarian/vegans. I’ll take a rock star taking a stand like that over Lars attacking music fans because they love music too much.

        • osanna@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I remember a study from a few decades ago that said pirates are often spending MORE on media than non-pirates, because they’re able to branch out and experiment with more media, then buy the media, instead of sticking to what they know and just buying the same old shit. I don’t know how to explain it. But pirates tend to spend more than non-pirates, allegedly. I’ll try to find the study.

          found something already: https://www.vice.com/en/article/study-again-shows-pirates-tend-to-be-the-biggest-buyers-of-legal-content/

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Thats exactly what happened back in the “Home taping is killing music” era of the 80s. The record companies were insisting on high taxes on blank tapes, which they wanted to collect to compensate for lost revenue on mix tapes and such.

            So they funded a study to prove their case, and the study found that those who did the most taping were also the ones who bought the most music. These people loved music so much that after they spent most of their disposable money on albums, they spent the remainder on blank tapes to get even more music.

            Home tapers turned out to be the strongest music fans, and biggest customers, and unsurprisingly, they discovered the same thing decades later with downloaders.

            That kind of kills their rationalizations for the draconian punishments they were demanding.

        • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lars? Lars Ulrich of Metallica fame? Why would he get mad over fans liking music? When did this happen? The Napster case, while bullshit, at least had something of a leg to stand on but this is just absurd.

      • greenMeanHoppinMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wow, it was tough to watch that whole video. I hope things have improved since then, although I’m sure in a lot of places they haven’t.

        Eat less meat and if you do eat meat, pay extra for pasture raised animal products.

        • DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some things get better, others get worse. It’s never a bad day to give up animal products.

          If you’d like to donate to a group that’s fighting for these animals check out thehumaneleague.org.

          💚💚💚

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I kinda want Section 230 to be revoked so the dam can break on “wrongful ban” class actions.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kind of tangential to the topic but reddit has been appropriating user names for celebrities and companies. The first known instance (as far as I know) was u/borat. I was surprised thiskind of thing wasn’t a bigger deal.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if u/paulmccartney is such a case. A basic name that’s only a 5 year old account. No way nobody grabbed that before.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s always interesting to see people commenting who don’t understand how reddit works. Which is fair - you can have an opinion. But knowing how it works makes a difference in how seriously I can take your opinion.

    Mods on reddit cannot do a sitewide ban. They can ban you from one or more subreddits they moderate.

    Admins do sitewide bans, which is what’s happened here, since you can see the profile has been banned.

    And these days, with reddit’s shitty AI moderation, it probably means a ban done by AI.

    Because this is not a normal person, someone will probably take a look at it and overturn it.

    If you’re a regular joe, however, them taking a look at it even if you appeal is pretty damned rare. And as some have mentioned - things that trigger AI as a “threat of violence” that a normal human would easily see are not - doesn’t matter, AI bans. You get a warning, 24-hour, 3-day, 10-day, 30-day, then permanent. Unless there’s something that accellerates that.

    As much as many people manage to survive without saying things AI picks up on, it’s damn easy to get unjustly banned, and it’s only gotten worse and worse over time.

    Anyone in this thread talking about bans from mods is technically offtopic, except that reddit itself is also the topic, so that’s fine, but you should understand that a mod banning you is not similar to what happened here. :P

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      not anymore they dont, they have AI moderation to do the sitewide bans/shadowbans, there is no input from the admins themselves.

    • mimavox@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, I got a site wide ban for wishing a missile strike on Putin. “Threat of violence”… as if it was something that I threatened to do :/

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got one for commenting on the France subreddit that it wasn’t surprising some people would carry justice by themselves if the police and courts do nothing. I wasn’t justifying, merely explaining. Subreddit ban, then permanent sitewide ban a few minutes later.

      • Benz@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        I once got a ban for quoting the current US president. Apparently when a random anonymous redditor says it, it’s “inciting violence,” but when the president says it, it’s “patriotic.”

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I got several bans for the same kind of thing.

          didn’t realize that clearly quoting somebody else’s words so they could be discussed was me saying and meaning those words myself

          • mimavox@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            First time is got a temp ban was when I said it was a pity that the Butler shooter missed. When I was back, I told to the story of why I had been banned, and bam! Got banned again for quoting myself. Reddit is totally insane.

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        My ban was because I replied to someone who wished Trump would succumb to his cheeseburger gods. I replied that instead I hope he strokes out and suffers.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I got a ban a few times for “advocating violence” or whatever when I said “I’m surprised there haven’t been more attacks on [whatever shitty group is harming people]”

          no judgement on it. just saying that I’m surprised they’re haven’t been more.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They have enough users that they don’t care that they could be banning long term users. It is ironic that they have their filters set so hypersensitive for the appearance of purity but I can find tons of hardcore porn on it.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        or the fact that troll farms, palintir and israeli bots are very pervasive but almost never dealt with. Yet they are increasing thier sensitivity to non-propaganda bots.